Wikia

RuneScape Wiki

Talk:Joeytje50/Crap

22,528pages
on this wiki

Back to page | < User talk:Joeytje50

Replacement filing cabinet
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.
Dragon scimitar detail
Archives
#1
#2
Don't read this. It's crap
#3
#4
#5
#6
Nubbishness
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
#17
#18

This page lists a load of crap. Please don't read it. If your eyes fall out, i'm not responsible.(Wink)


YOU KNOW WHAT?! I LEAVE! WELL DONE DEGENRET, ANDORINKATO(who blocked me agains the rules of RS:UBP), LIQUIDHELIUM, AJRADDATZ, Evil1888 and Haloolah123!{{Retired}} Unblock template was here

^^This is because in other cases spam isnt vandalism either, and it does definetely not violate the other 2

---
Should i come back?
Degenret is right in this case
You are right in this case
Just don't come back
---
The above poll was in violation of Forum:"Everybody_hates_me"-- Degen says Unban TLUL  10:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

­Should i come back?
 
28
 

The poll was created at 11:29 on October 2, 2010, and so far 28 people voted.

Contents

what the hell Edit

Thanks. Your post on the RSOF makes the wiki user base look like a bunch of whining spoiled children because we are not a Platinum site. Insulting and mocking the other sites listed is quite immature. If you wish to be that way, fine. But do not for a moment do so in a manner suggesting that you speak for the wiki when you do so. It demeans all of us and lessens the wiki in the eyes of all who will read that.--Degenret01 00:41, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

I understand you want us to be platinum. What you missed is Jagexs requirements for each level. And insulting the other sites on behalf of the wiki is in very poor taste. That is NOT what will get Jagex to change their minds. --Degenret01 07:01, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

helpful contributors Edit

Do not call their edits spam, and do not tell them no more than 5 edits per minute. That was some BS you left on his page and I better not see it again.-- Degen says Unban TLUL  16:08, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

For the record, no such policy exists to limit edits to 5 or under per minute.-- Degen says Unban TLUL  00:44, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Rudeness to new people, part 2 Edit

When I see some one being rude to a new person I am damn well gonna let them know not to do it. YOU have been around for a while and should know better. If you and Mr. Helm wish to start a desysop thread I will not have any problems with that what so ever. I have never claimed to be better than you so your comment about me not being better is totally pointless. I treat all editors with the respect they deserve. New editors ar our future, and if you some at them the way you did that future will not happen. And do not try to blame Cook, HIS message to you was clear and direct and appropriate. Your message to Evil said NOTHING about awb.-- Degen says Unban TLUL  21:14, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Informing you not to treat new people in a certain way is not rude. Nothing I have said to you is rude. If you cannot handle being critiqued for your actions, then do not leave people messages as you did.-- Degen says Unban TLUL  22:04, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Joey, can you take it down a notch please? Arguing like this isn't going to do you much good. Thanks, --King LiquidheliumTalk 22:12, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well, see, Degen isn't talking in ALL CAPS, nor is he using too harsh language. And please don't start a desysop Degen thread. It's going to cause unnecessary wiki drama, and would almost certainly fail. I would strong oppose it if you did. --King LiquidheliumTalk
Man, you have a serious problem. You have called me rude three times when I have not been rude to you once. Everything I have said to you is on point. If you think I have been wrong, go start that thread to desysop me as you threatened. But stop telling me to not be rude when I have not done so.-- Degen says Unban TLUL  22:19, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Urm, sorry to but in like this, but couldn't you guys just... forget about it...? There is far too much fighting in the wiki D: LordDarkPhantom 17:13, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Degen's talk page Edit

What you did there was ridiculous; I've reverted it. Talk with him about it, don't lag up the computers of anyone who wants to leave him a message. That is extremely inconsiderate. ajr 21:12, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Not cool. Full slayer helmet Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon platebody 21:14, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
And removing it is acceptable under RS:DDD, perhaps you should read it all. Full slayer helmet Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon platebody 21:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
Dude, don't tell Degen not to be a dick when you ARE BEING A DICK. Grow up a bit please. HaloTalk 21:19, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't matter what he has done, there is no need to resort to such things. If you feel that discussions are being closed prematurely, make a Yew Grove thread about it. Full slayer helmet Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon platebody 21:22, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
Don't leave, just talk about it. Full slayer helmet Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon platebody 21:30, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
Then get someone else to talk to him. Heck, I will if need be. But don't go doing what you did. ajr 21:33, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
You bloody crashed me.   Swizz Talk   Events!   09:52, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page spam Edit

I don't know what's going on between you and Degen, but I can't conceive of anything that would rationally motivate you to fill his talk page with spam and crash peoples' browsers. That's about as far from appropriate as it gets. If you have an issue with him or anyone else, resolve it in a civilized manner instead of resorting to stupid stuff like that. Hopefully you'll be able to do so when you get back from your little vacation.

Other users: If I'm missing a boat load of context, rather than explaining it all to me, just have someone undo the block. I don't particularly care to get involved in wiki drama, but hoo boy that was a stupid thing for Joey to do. --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 21:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

.... Edit

What's the point of saying you quit then making a poll asking people if they want you back, which only has one "supporter"?   Swizz Talk   Events!   10:15, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Whats the point in posting that when it says

If you want to ask something, message me ingame, because some nub blocked me, and now i can't answer talk pages? Hunter cape (t) Sentra246Blue h'ween mask 10:30, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

He can just answer it here. That's the point. bad_fetustalk 10:32, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Your notice on the top of the page. Edit

Meh, just wanted to pop in and tell you that I agreed with them. You were being immature, were warned, and you decided to spam. That indeed does deserve banning. bad_fetustalk 10:22, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Don't be a noob Edit

Don't be a noob degenret. JOEYTJE50TALK 12:48, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

It IS allowed:
The proposal to bar polls asking whether other users what the user to leave/if the users "hate" said user is successful and now to be covered under the user treatment policy.

Where you see something about asking to come back or not? stop being a noob and Don't edit my page exept for messages. JOEYTJE50TALK 13:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Guys, its my talk page, so dont edit it! i cant access my own userpage, so ill have to place things here! JOEYTJE50TALK 13:10, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
First, RS:DEU has nothing to do with talk pages. Second, see User talk:Sentra246#leaving/staying/coming back=same thing - "I don't like butting in but... Degen is right the wording and everything dosent matter. The policy exist to prevent accidental anger and disputes. If there Is a chance that someone could get angry because of the poll results it shouldn't be made...(just IMO) - [Pharos]" --Iiii I I I 13:07, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Don't delete discussions. --Iiii I I I 13:11, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Desysop Degenret01 Edit

I think degenret01 should be desysoped, and i will start a thread as soon as my block expires. The following reasons are why i think that:

The following is completely quoted from Steler's talk archive. Liquidhelium did NOT participate in making this thread, and i just quote this to reduce writing work for myself.

"So, Ajr recently changed his signature to an admin crown with "jraddatz" text on the side. You know that. You also know that I modified it to have "Ajraddatz" text due to RS:SIG issues. Anyways, Degen said here that because Rwojy gets to use a bucket in his signature, Ajr was able to use the sysop crown's A for the A in his name, due to AEAE. I then told him that Rwojy's signature complied with the rules, since it had "rwojy" text in it. Degen complained that it wasn't readable, and accused me of turning a blind eye to a case of GTS because Rwojy was my friend. So, I basically told him that I don't make favors for friends.

Next thing you know, he archives that conversation as "troll fodder" (see edit summary). I found that highly offensive, and confronted him about it. I was especially miffed because he has previously accused me of violating UTP because I made a small link between him and someone who pushes for unnecessary change. So, it's now highly offensive to label someone as supporting unnecessary change but not highly offensive to call someone a troll? Degen completely ignored my comments as spam.

At that point, I seriously considered starting a "Desysop Degen" or "Ban Degen" thread, or at least filing a formal complaint to someone like Azaz about Degen. I decided against it because it would be highly unlikely to pass and because I had enough wiki drama. Anyways, that's how I lost quite a lot of respect for Degen. --King LiquidheliumTalk 02:59, September 18, 2010 (UTC)"


From now on only things i wrote myself.

I saw his post on a forum thread. He could also have stayed calm, but he got angry on instance
once again, he is angry for no good reason imo
He calls about everything "spam"

He has done things like this multiple times. I'm giving a couple of examples that have to do with myself.

I wrote something on the forums of runescape he didn't like, and reacted very rude to it.
when i wrote something about a limit of 5 edits per minute on User:Dead evil84's talk. I heard that information from Cook me plox, who has likely got it from RS:AWB#Regulations. I just didn't understand it the right way, but did mean it with good faith. Also he says "and I better not see it again." like he's the police or something, and he is better, which he isn't
he doesn't seem to see he is acting quite rude
after placing back the discussion because it was not over yet, he deleted it again within 6 hours
He ignores even the messages asking if im ignoring him, which is very rude

What i suggest is that we run another rfa, which would be like if he was not an admin yet, and then see if he would have reached adminship if he wasn't now. If he fails for this fake rfa, i think his adminship should be removed. JOEYTJE50TALK 13:33, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Good idea but there's no point, there will only be a few opposes, just from people like you who are just full of hate right now.   Swizz Talk   Events!   21:27, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

A bit of historical drama Edit

Talk page dramas can be interesting to look at from the sidelines. I was just browsing through your history when I found your old block appeal with a link saying that User talk:Thebrains222/Archive 3 was spam and it was allowed, hopefully you already know why it was allowed, it was because that was just a bit of fun between me and Sentra, see here. There is a difference between that and what you did, which I do not wish to discuss. 222 talk 04:07, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki