From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape

Contents 1 RE:Morian's talk 2 Help? 3 Rollback rights? 4 RE: in need of sysop assistance 5 3RR 6 Template:Unblock 7 do you have IM? 8 zomg again? 9 Template:Sacred items 10 Keep it up! 11 excellent choice 12 Re: #1 13 Sexual preferences 14 Signature 15 Circus 16 Block 17 Re: Block

[edit] RE:Morian's talk

No, you can't. The message I left had nothing to do with you. Morian was perfectly capable of pointing out the deleted page to me. No one asked you. And about Blanko's talk, I'm an admin. He addressed admins, because only ADMINS can decide on his block situation. So yeah, I could say the same about Blanko's talk to you also. Christine 02:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help?

Hey, for some reason my computer here at work today is refusing to download images, so could you tell me if this is a personal picture? It sounds like it from the title, but I'm unable to see anything. Thanks! 20:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rollback rights?

Earth, being that you have rollback rights on the RSwiki, I was wondering if I could ask you a quick question. How do you get rollback rights? Is is a process similar to RFA, or do you just ask a bureaucrat? Any clarification would be appreciated greatly!

Thanks- Aburnett001 ^{{Talk} {#}} 00:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: in need of sysop assistance

It was a guy with a "-_-"-styled face flipping the viewer off, then two hands below that also flipping the view off. How pleasant, eh? Chiafriend12 05:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

No need to fear, thanks to RS:IAR (which Blanko is very fond of abusing) you're safe from any blocks that would normally result (since your undoing the edits of a troll).-- 22:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Unblock

Say, just to be balanced, should we make a Template:Reblock? you know one for users who want unblocked users to be reblocked? ~kytti khat– 18:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Okay but it wasn't an attempt to ABF, it was an attempt to share what i find humorous. ~kytti khat– 18:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

"heh" see i got a little chuckle out of you.

[edit] do you have IM?

i'm on most major networks. my email link here is active too, if you want to keep your im less than public that is. I'll be on most of the night likely, just a matter of seeing if we can connect. 02:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] zomg again?

this is the part were you scream from teh battlefront, "MEDIC!" right? ~kytti khat– 04:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't stealing him, i was returning him silly, btw there is a cure poison prayer, it's from The Great Brain Robbery, you have to use two items to do it however (wearing one even). Now i'm curious what the effect of logging into a f2p server poisoned would be like, btw how long were you pking on your 50k run? ~kytti khat– 04:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

So where is your character currently located at? ~kytti khat– 04:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Sacred items

We're implementing a new feature called Template:Navbox (see the Yew Grove). This template basically standardises all navigation templates and adds a category called Category:Navigational templates. I was sad to see the edits (to use Navbox) in Template:Sacred items reverted (first by Sara, then by you) as the edits were beneficial to this wiki.   az ^talk   03:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Keep it up!

It's because of your redirects that I can type in pretty much anything to find what it is I need. Maybe you're excessive, but it sure helps! =P Thanks Earth... 03:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] excellent choice

for image on the Template:Under Construction template. ~kytti khat– 23:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: #1

I highly doubt it. The only way to know for sure would be to ask him ingame. At any rate, he's a great actor and has fooled many noobs :P Dtm142 21:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

(Late response D:) Per Dtm, but I doubt it less. You never know, right? I just learned that a fellow mod I kinda' know uses this site. Never expected that. Chiafriend12 00:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't help that I have never been to (or really even heard of) TruthScape or Wikipedia Review. Chiafriend12 07:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sexual preferences

Sexual comments are not appropriate on the wiki, so why would declaring sexual preferences be? Allowing something like that would mean there would be no reason to stop people from making templates such as:

• User loves blowjobs.
• User swallows.
• User likes anal.
• User likes orgies.

They all fall under sexual preference, which doesn't need to be here. 23:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Adding to this, you need to understand that the majority of the users on the encyclopedia are underage, and encouraging sexual content is illegal. We don't need 9 year old kids putting User is gay. on their user page because they still giggle at the word gay. It is simply not appropriate for this occasion. 00:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signature

Owned. =D. Chiafriend12 04:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Circus

Oh come now, I may find your wars with Christine humourous but I certainly do not take such matters lightly. The way you closed your RfA last time proved that you were not in full check of your emotions, and that scares me in an admin, (also the reason I had to oppose Stinkowing's RfB). I've said so (or at least indicated) before that if you go three months without any further incidents (should this RfA fail) that I would fully hearted support your bid and I will stand by that promise.-- 05:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Very well then, out of respect for your work with the wiki and the recent attempts to rise above the past I will change my vote to neutral.--

Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}

06:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block

1.) It should only be a 2 week block for a single incident of incivility. 2.) I'm not stupid. You sent the fucking messages IN THE FIRST PLACE christine. nobody else hates me enough to send that kind of manipulative crap in PMs. earth_(t) 00:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

What fucking message?! Christine 01:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

...lol -.- earth_(t) 01:29, 11 December 2008 (UTC)~

I fully support the block. --Charitwo^Talk 00:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, an indefinite block seems like a little too much...  C Teng ^talk 00:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

can we block for abusive 3rd party communication? based on the utter garbage she's been telling me, I had every right to say that! earth_(t) 00:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Gosh I really want to know what's going on here >_<. FTWinston! ^talk 00:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

earth, i know ur pissed that now you failed 4 rfas dispite your large number of edits, i would feel the same thing, in fact, im surprised deg was elected as an admin with an editcount that barely manages a quarter of your editcount. but seriously, christine did not know that what she wrote our RFA was pissin u off, and maybe she is responsible for making you fail in all 4 RFAS, but you should NOT take it out on her by using her photo, that is slander in the mpost extreme form, total rune is a banned and dreaded user of the wiki, and he's never been regretting it, (not to mention he used proxies like blanko 2 harass people) and dont take christine personal. she's under a LOT of stress editing other wikis as well as this and her hell load of schoolwork, so of course she is being like this, but under no circumstances whatsoever should you takew it out like that (not to mention insulting christine by suggesting that she be blocked, but it wont work anyway because she can unblock herself), in some ways, it is not just your fault, i think that christine provoked you into doing this, but believe me she did not meant to slander, and i agree that most of the wiki population is a bunch of douchebags, but taking it out like that won't get any point across. you shouldn't let your edits go to waste by making yourself a target for their bans, instead be noble, polite and keep ur nerves down, then, you can be a admin or a b'crat later, and intelligently punish those who had wronged you rightfully

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 13:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I still fail to see exactly what Christine did wrong in those RFAs. RFA is not a nice, friendly process. RFAs are meant to be scrutinized - opposing is allowed and encouraged if a user has demonstrated an inability to use admin powers properly. I shudder to think of what would have actually happened if Earthere had been sysopped. Dtm142 01:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

It is not a single instance of incivility we are talking about here, your block log is huge. An infinite block is entirely appropriate given your previous record, as you have shown that you cannot control yourself. As for these personal messages, for which you seem unsure of the source, they have no bearing on the matter. The simple fact is, you made a very personal attack on Christine, on the wiki, and you have been punished for it. Hurston ^{(T # C)} 14:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

seriously, Earth, therere's one thing they you must do, and yet always fail to do, is NO Personal attacks and that you should Calm down, you always fail because you get pissed and take it in too much, i dont want to see another seasoned good editor go down the way Blanko and Total went, so just listen, because it's always because you get pissed, that's why you never got a scuessful RFA.

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 15:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

k, now that I've gained the courage to return to this Wiki...

• 1) you told me to post that. -.-
• 2) the previous blocks weren't justified.
• 3) I never said that photo was of you. seriously. if I did, it was an accident, as I remember BLANKING out extra offensive content YOU told me to put in, becuase I knew it would hit me back in the long run.
• 4) reiterating that it's a personal attack versus all of the bullshit Christine has done to me. it is a personal attack, and given the direct circumstances, under a neutral admin's judgment, I deserved a block, perhaps for a couple weeks, but not indefinitely. given the messages tho, I wouldn't be surprised if you were blocked as well. earth_(t) 05:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)~

An excerpt from RS:BLOCK (right after I reworded it):

"To be banned, a user in question must have community consensus or Wikia staff approval."

There has been no full-scale community discussion on whether or not Earthere should be permanently blocked. There has also, to my knowledge, not been a Wikia staff member to approve of his infinite blocking. If we were to be the truthful and ideal Wikians we're supposed to be, we would abide by our own policy, and reblock Earthere for a set ammount of time while a discussion is underway.

Does anyone remember Ben? His intentions (of which I shall not mention...) (as I see it, were worse than Earthere's action in question) would have gotten him permanently banned. Instead, he was allowed to continue contributing and was just pardoned of the possibility of adminship.

RS:AGF - Not that you should apply that to the action in question, but remember one thing: [when not in provoked outrages,] Earthere is here to help the wiki. His good deeds, by far, outweigh the bad. By far. Chiafriend12 07:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC) (Standing up for the segregated is awesome :o.)

mind me, who is ben? earth_(t) 13:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• I honestly never wanted adminship in the 4th nomination. I created the whole RfA just to see my standing in the community. call it trolling if you'd like, meh. I didn't really care.
• I'm ranked #8 or some number around there. in terms of edit count
• for every editor i've harassed or personally attacked there are at least 10 users who would, most likely, say I'm kind to them. not trying to be vain or stuck up here, as civility is more of a moral than any sort of thing to brag about.
• and yes, if I truly wanted adminship, it would've been obtained months ago. RfA is a stupid, bureaucratic process on how suitable an established user is for a desk job. being a guy who was once interested in politics/law, I knew exactly how to win it, properly sucking up, exploiting loopholes, whoring filibuster logic, feigning maturity. basically the ways congress work... nothing wrong with congress, but this is a ****ing fan site run by a bunch of ****ing MMORPG addicts--bureaucracy and politics are completely uneccessary. I learned that 6 months ago incidentally...
• people tend to throw out common sense in favor of blunt evidence. did I seriously have to tell you that I wanted to indefinitely block Christine? you couldn't have figured that out BY YOURSELVES? transparency isn't welcome at all evidently... I'm blunt, I'm honest, and again I despise deceptive, bureaucratic warfare. I dislike Christine, I really wish she returned to her wikibreak. however, I'm going to reverse the personal attack altogether. honest, I'm going to be completely honest here; she isn't ugly really, is ok I suppose. a certain perverse IRL friend of mine, after committing a crime of underage drinking, would most certainly tap that. this is a compliment. in a very roundabout way, as I do not enjoy complimenting you.
• Dropping the issue of the messages which would prolong this conflict even further. earth_(t) 13:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

"a certain perverse IRL friend of mine, after committing a crime of underage drinking, would most certainly tap that.". Lmao! That's a little gross to say to someone you don't know IRL, tbh. I agree fully with everything Chia said now, and will mirror any of his opinions on this (lawls, I most certainly do have a mind of my own). I think those revisions should be undeleted, because censoring evidence to admins only will not help a community consensus. Any interested non-sysop will want to see just how severe what Earthere did was. Can we at least know the "caption" or whatever it was? Also, was "Ben" Beanball36? He really didn't do anything wrong, if you're implying he did... FTWinston! ^talk 17:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

No, this is Ben.--

Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}

17:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

What did he do? :X FTWinston! ^talk 17:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

It's not what he did, it's what he came to do.--

Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}

18:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Nq2h was pretty cool from what I saw...

Lawl, pardon the PG-13. I figured a comment like that wouldn't be overlooked for being saccharin. =p earth_(t) 18:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• Wait... Are you saying that Christine told you to make those edits to your userpage (she set you up in other words)? Please explain in detail, I'm not understanding completely.
• If you never intended to get adminship in your last RFA, you shouldn't have started it. Using RFA for any purpose other than honestly requesting sysop powers is abusing our community processes and overall a blockable offence. RFA is not a game.
• All of your past blocks were justified. Just because you do not agree with them doesn't mean that they weren't justified.
• Having a high edit count doesn't mean that you're immune to blocks. You seem to be holding yourself above other editors.
• To those who are interested, here is the deleted revision of Earthere's userpage:

---

I hate you guys. therefore I quit

also, a certain banned user showed me this:

[Picture removed for privacy reasons.]

HOLY HELL, TAKE THE CAMERA AWAY

---

• I would like to see an explaination from Earthere before we bring staff into this. I'm not sure what he means about the messages or whethere he is telling the truth.
• Complaining about our community processes and making sexist comments won't help your cause Earthere.

Dtm142 21:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• drop it, just do so.
• people were under the impression that RfA was life or death for me. I exaggerated a bit. sorry.
• true. I meant "weren't justified [very well]."
• nope, just stating that I'm consistently making contributions. so it's not like I'm spending all of my time trolling talkspace.
• yes, that content is accurate
• drop it, please. and the staff don't need to be brought into this. I shouldn't have been indefinitely blocked in the first place as there was no visible consensus. ifthere's IRC logs that say otherwise, please post them somewhere. or don't. =/
• I most certainly will criticize our processes if I wish, to an extent the criticism was well thought out and wasn't mindless crap. and holy cow Dtm, have you entered high school yet? the comment was most certainly not sexist, though rather rude, and at least in midwest culture is seen as comic relief. take it in proper context and realize that the comment was positive, regardless of how stupid it might sound to you (and christine most likely, soz). earth_(t) 21:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

No. The revisions of your userpage are the reason that you're blocked. The truth must be told if you're to be unblocked. You can't negotiate with Total Rune, post a real life picture of another editor whom you've had a history with on your userpage, attack them, then expect us to just drop the subject when you're being held responsible for it. An inability to take responsibility for your actions shows me that you should remain blocked. Tell us the complete story, as accurately as possible. However, I have a strong suspicion that you're just trying to abuse the wiki's trust again. As for the comments about RFA, those were extremely aggressive, untrue, and biased. In addition, I certainly would not want to be told that a "preverse drunk" was sexually attracted to a picture of myself in Grade 8. Dtm142 22:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

drop it, you know, as in the "anonymous" harassment I've been receiving in the past year. not the thing itself. and I thought christine was 16-17... didn't know that particular picture was from grade 8. going to make this short and simple; I apologized for the user page. just assume the anonymous messages were lies told by me. give me a month long block or something. I'll deal. earth_(t) 22:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

honestly, you shouldn't have opinions on my opinions, which in themselves are crude and incredibly defensive. "opinions are like an *******; everybody has one, but nobody wants to hear about it." you, and other editors skimming this dramatic exchange, most likely disagree--that's fine, explain why but avoid trashing their opinions altogether. I'd connect that last statement to the ******* metaphor, but that would be somewhat grotesque, so I won't. earth_(t) 22:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)~

actually gettin christine's pic is about as easy as eating a small mince pie, i cant tell due to privacy reasons but it really is Easy, so if yu don't mind me saying, it would be better for christine if she never posted it in the first place, besides, that pic looks like when she was 15

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 17:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Dude I was THIRTEEN. NO ONE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT HOW THEY THOUGHT I WAS HOT TO BEGIN WITH, LET ALONE WANTING TO HAVE SEX WITH ME AT THIRTEEN. Christine 06:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

That's what I've been trying to say >_<. FTWinston! ^talk 02:38, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Why wouldn't she put it up? It's MySpace. You put photos there. FTWinston! ^talk 18:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Remember the "be careful what you put on the internet" mantra. Butterman62 (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

That's bull. He only has it because of Total. I shouldn't live in fear of someone from the very community I participate in to use the picture so maliciously. Christine 06:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

no, it's easy, you can just copy+paste the pic or printscreen, then you can upload it or use hotlinking to being the pic 2 view

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 16:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Dude. NO. Do you even have a myspace? You don't know how it works. No one except my friends can access my pictures. The only way non-friends can see pictures are if they're directly linked to, as Earthere did. The only person who has ever been my friend who would give him the link was Total, and I deleted him at least 6 months ago. But no one else can see them. Christine 19:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

no, im talking abour ur black and white profile pic, which i can easily access by searching clv309 along with myspace on google.

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 13:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

FFS, I know people can see THAT. I'm talking about the fucking private picture that he DIDN'T have access to. Going through the means to get THAT is malicious, and he DOESN'T deserve to be unblocked. Christine 20:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

oh okay den, no need 2 shout, christine, calm down.

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 11:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

with all due respect i think that the community is partly to blame for this situation, persons in perticular is the supposed "victim" christine and butterman, the fustration can clearly be felt in his fourth RFA that he failed dispite 3k of edits clearly did nothing to lighten his mood, earth regards christine as partly to blame for the failure and has taken measures to get back, as inappropoiate as that may be, the community has provoked him, seeing himself fail with 3k of edits and seeing degenet01 get a sucessful RFA with less than 1k of edits made him cross, and in that fustration he took out on the community which he believes are all aganist him, so those who complain that they had been wronged had the blame within themselves as well. notice that in every RFA earth has, people like christine has voted oppose and that usally struck the final blow with that kind of vengeance from the admins who does not allow those who do not go with their view to be banned, and in that, i think, the community should, instead of pointing fingers and making earth a scrapegoat, look upon themselves, sort the problem from yourself first, and think about what do they feel when they done that, then hand out the punishment

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 15:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Again, Btz, I don't see how I did anything wrong. I've already described what I thought on your talk page. Butterman62 (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Btzkillerv, you don't seem to know what RFA is actually about. There is nothing wrong with opposing an RFA. RFAs can and should fail if it means that an unqualified candidate is not given adminship. Edit count alone does not entitle you to sysop powers. Character and overall maturity are far more important factors than a number. Earthere's latest performance has proven to the community that he should not have been sysopped. Dtm142 01:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm not talking about what i think, i'm talking about what he throught, if you look carefully you will notice that *sorry christine* christine has always posted a killer vote which did a role in making earth fail, and if you checked christine's language on his RFA you will see that earth has a grudge aganist her, that's it full stop.

Btzkillerv has entered the building! 11:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Having a grudge against an editor does not entitle you to put up a picture of them on your userpage and attack it. Although Earthere and Christine may dislike each other, the oppose reasons were certainly valid and obviously raised attention from the community. As I said earlier, it is the responsibility of the community members to scrutinize RFA candidates to ensure that those who are undeserving of adminship are not given it. You cannot blame someone else who performed their duty for Earthere's disruptive behaviour. Dtm142 21:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Seriously no one here wants to see you, earth, end up like total rune, you have made a lot of edits indeed, but the thing is, pissing christine off is more or less internet-suicidal, bucause you know christine will not even blink at blocking you instantly, not to mention protecting your talk. Btzkillerv has entered the building! 16:04, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Block

It's been a while, I've served my time. Can I have a second chance at this? :/ earth_(t) 23:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

i think you have changed from what i have seen so i think you deserve another chance (i cant let you off block, me no admin) :( Windows 7 User 05:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The message was placed a few months ago. o_O Powers38 ^{TalkI'm stalking your talk page, beware.} 06:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

And the community decided to maintain his ban.--

Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}

06:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)