This is frustrating. I created a template that would make it easy to see which ranged hats are better than other ranged hats, and I put them in order of the increase in ranged attack stats that each hat gives you.
Vimescarrot came along and put them in a different order -- he said it was in order of power of the item, but it seems to put less powerful hats over more powerful hats. I guess it depends how you measure power, offence or defence. Maybe resale value?
Now the frustration -- I cannot figure out how to discuss this with Vimescarrot via email or otherwise. I have no way of knowing if he watches this page and would see edit comments that I put -- and he may be right about power, but we cannot discuss it. <sigh>
- If you wanted to discuss with me personally, you'd use my talk page. In cases like this, it's best to use the talk page of the article (or in this case, template) in question. To get me to see it you'd just give me a nudge on my talk page. I kinda rushed what I was doing on this page. I'll have another look at it now. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 07:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- The only one I changed was Karil's, and that was due to its affilation with a Barrows set. However, since it is in fact a completely rubbish Barrows set, as well as being rubbish itself, I've moved it back to where it probably was before. Also made a little addition, showing what each helm gives, range attack-wise. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 07:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)