This talk page is for discussing Template:Minigames.
Sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to the RuneScape Wiki? Read our FAQ.	Be civil Assume good faith Don't delete discussions

Are you serious the Burthorpe Games room is pvp? 84.195.47.15 20:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes,the games room is pvp. pvp means player versus player,so it is pvp,but not a pking type of pvp. --

Captain Sciz

Talk • Edits • Hiscores

15:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Player versus player consists of one player directly attacking another. So there is absolutely no reason for the Games Room and Mobilising Armies to be there. ShinyUnown _{T | C | E} 11:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

It is pvp, it is 'player versus player', which means that two players play against each other, which is exactly what the GR and MA are about. Oil4burgers ^Talk 11:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly opening up an old topic again, but I'm inclined to agree with the above comment. I've just added Player-owned ports to the interface and I'm a bit confused about placing it in with the Flash Powder Factory, Mobilising Armies and Conquest to name just three. Saying that these are solo is silly. By simple examination of the fact that you need another player as an opponent before you can play the game, they are by definition "Player versus player". However I recognise that this may cause confusion among those who assign combat properties to that phrase. Does anyone have any objections to introducing a fourth category, "Vs. games (noncombat)" and renaming "PvP" to "PvP (combat)"? I think it would make more sense than the current setup, will better direct the less-experienced towards minigames suiting their preferences, and should satisfy purists who insist that PvP is synonymous with combat. Magma2050 ^{T C E} 13:47, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Agility courses Edit

Should the agility courses really be included in this navbox?? I don't know anyone would calls agility courses mini-games. It would be very easy to create a agility course navbox. _{Evil Yanks} ^talk 08:59, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Agility courses cannot be classified as activities. Corrected the template. Regis^Talk 15:19, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Make sure you remove the navbox from all the agility course pages, create a new navbox for agility courses and add that to the pages, too.  Gaz Lloyd _Awesome^Events!_99s 15:20, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

All Fired Up Edit

To the extent of my knowledge, All Fired Up isn't really a team game... Shouldn't it be classified under the solo activity section? Not sure if I can change that or not. Lefthandedkid 04:01, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

it really should... you can have other help you but your not supposed to. change it, someone has a problem they can come here. Evil1888 ^{Talk A's L} 04:04, August 15, 2010 (UTC)