Hey, is this really needed? All city or area articles in this wiki have already a template of their navigation. This dude is evillike hellKorak 13:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Pages souldn't be just an infobox. If a city has a ruler/bank/ect., it should say it on the page. Tes Fan 13:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
This passed my mind too when I created it. But I think it's needed because it's for quick information. People just have to refer to the top of the page to already know what the city contains. So I think it would go good. And also some city articles didn't contain the information that's included on the template. And about the navigation thing, I think it should be included in the infobox (like wikipedia:Bulleen, Victoria's infobox) or else things get messy. Anyway I'm a newcomer to this wiki so do what you want. Cheers :), Chicken7 >talk 10:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I think we should add the map back to it. I think it looks better and neater, and for players who need to look at the map quickly can just click on it and there. Again, I don't really care what happens though. What does everyone else think? Chicken7 >talk 08:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Seeing as a lot of the people on this wiki are in America or England, they would not see this message in the recent changes. So I'll add it anyway. Chicken7 >talk 10:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I think the maps are way too big. They are squishing the rest of the article. oh, Chicken7 >talk 03:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC) (chicken7)
Is there another template for cities such as Arposandra where no map exists? If not I'll attempt to edit this template to accommodate a map=no type entry. -~kytti khat 13:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
The terrorist references in this template are not funny. They need to be replaced with a more suitable example.
66.57.118.220 22:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Jagex is spreading censorship and lack of humour everywhere... Patheticcockroach(Talk) 06:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)