The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. The result was Keep. 222 ^talk 11:06, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Mod Ana

Whilst Mod Ana is one of my favourite developers, having an article with so little information is kind of pointless. Either we have a page for every JMod or the very few we have lots of information on (Mod Mark, Mod MMG, Andrew, etc.). Mod Ana is not a major JMod in the grand scheme of things.

Delete - As nominator. Cåm 23:55,20/6/2012 (UTC)

Comment - Forum:Articles for Jagex Staff. 23:57, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

Either way, the page as it stands has a list of 5 updates, 2 bits of filler trivia and one piece of game related trivia. She's also one of the newer, less established JMods and as such doesn't have much information regarding her. Cåm 00:04,21/6/2012 (UTC)

Oppose - We added fairly firm criteria for when to make articles on staff in last year's thread. I'm not going to go over all of that again (because at the time it seemed endless) but this article has at least sufficient content to allow it to stay. Ronan ^Talk 09:32, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Not notable. By all means we should have pages on important moderators like founders and major department heads, but is this person really relevant? How many other junior mods could we write a couple sentences about, and how many of them would be useful? It's Cook's afterbirth day! 09:48, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - We can have articles on any Jmod per the thread. If you think it hasn't got enough information, you could look for it. I was unable to find more than this. Fswe1 Lore project • Fun gallery
My quests • Cutscenes 12:25, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

"If you think it hasn't got enough information, you could look for it. I was unable to find more than this." Might that be a sign that there isn't any other information? It's Cook's afterbirth day! 02:03, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

You could add that she's the Icyene curator, but that's sort of given considering that she's developing the Myreque series. Other than that, there probably isn't much other than trivia to put in and trivia doesn't really make an article. Cåm 09:25,22/6/2012 (UTC)

In that case, she isn't a stub. we have smaller articles. Fswe1 Lore project • Fun gallery
My quests • Cutscenes 14:40, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

"We have smaller articles" is a terrible reason to keep pages. It's Cook's afterbirth day! 15:58, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support - While I'm all for having articles for ALL the things, that article is practically an empty page. Honestly, nobody is going to read an article to learn some jmod's favourite colour is red. bad_fetus^talk 12:31, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - I can see someone reading a quest, see who developed it and then want to see which other content was developed by that mod. For this purpose however, there should be links from content towards the mod's pages, and there should be pages for every mod. Just because there are no pages for most other mods, does not necessarily mean that there shouldn't be. For at least the content developers there is something to write on their pages, namely a list of the content they developed. ^T_H^A_R^K_O^N 18:04, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support - The article's ridiculously short(Surprised there's no stub template here) and most of the article is the list of quests she worked on-take that out, and most of it is trivia. If she wa sa major JMod, I might've thought differently, but she's rather insignificant.Vommack 14:26, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Being a stub has nothing to do with absolute size of a page. It has to do with the content of a page relative its possible amount of content. ^T_H^A_R^K_O^N 20:04, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Although we are able to have pages for any JMod, it isn't necessary that we do actually have them all (for now, at least). I mean, come on, do we even know the names of every staff member, former and current, of Jagex? --クールネシ^トーク 23:39, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

You support deleting this one, whilst simultaneously saying that we are able to have pages for any JMod? ^T_H^A_R^K_O^N 15:30, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

She said 'we are able to', she didn't say 'we should'. bad_fetus^talk 17:41, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

I took that as meaning they are not required but still allowed. ^T_H^A_R^K_O^N 20:04, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support - We should only have articles for JMods that we have a lot of information about. There's not much usefulness to the page at all. Also, I've added a stub to the page. Ant103010 ^Talk

Oppose - as Tharkon pointed out it does provide useful navigation to said mod's developed content. -- 20:47, July 12, 2012 (UTC)

We could do that in a different way without having nearly-blank pages for each developer. A table, perhaps. It could even be dynamically updated. It's Cook's afterbirth day! 13:22, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

Yea, don't have any problem with that. Change to indifferent. -- 21:14, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

{{Rfc|Discussion has died down.}} Cåm 10:45,7/8/2012 (UTC)

Closed - There is no consensus to delete Mod Ana. 222 ^talk 11:06, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.