Blacksmith working the bellows[]
I remember how twice previously that it was decided that living non-interactive scenery should not be deleted in vfds (here and here) though this should still technically be deleted because the Granularity policy still says otherwise. I felt that it was best to host a VFD for this page, since it is the safest option. I am moot on the subject btw. 
Evil Yanks talk 06:03, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Normally I'd keep, but this article has almost no information, no pictures and not even the examine info. ~ 
Sentry Telos Talk 06:56, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Leaning to keep - Here is a little more criteria (on my part): Is the NPC referenced anywhere else, such as a quest? Is there even a name involved? This is certainly a real fuzzy line here. The article could simply be tagged as a stub and "under construction", and certainly could be improved. If all that remains is this one line of text, I'd say delete, but consider that somebody else could come along and recreate this article with a screen shot and better prose to describe what is seen here. I don't have a problem with trying to push the wiki to the next level by describing these sorts of NPCs, but we should also have something that players would actually bother with reading as well. --Robert Horning 13:18, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - I've re-written the article, and while it's far from up to the Wiki's standards, I think it now contains enough information to justify its keeping. While the NPC appears simple on the surface, the history that led to his addition is actually somewhat interesting and has been added to the page. There is probably more that could be added, and an image/examine entry would definitely help to wrap the page up, but I think in its current state it's atleast passable. 
Morian Smith 
20:02, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Changed to keep - It still needs editing but the amount of information (IMO) now warrants a keep. ~ Sentry Telos Talk 20:07, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Comment - I've just added a picture. --Iiii I I I 20:09, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - We do have articles on hay bales and whatnot, why not keep this ? Also, I've added a bit more info and his examine text. 
Talk Newbie856 edit count Nomad guide
20:28, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Per Morian --
Nightgunner Talk 
20:33, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Why keep Ardal but not this? 
Oil4 Talk 20:33, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Comment, well, question Should I make a template for Interactive Scenery with no other categories, such as Hay bales and other ? And, if so, what options should it ? I've already thought of : Image (duh), name, location and interactive options (need better name) and type, but, I feel it's missing some things, what else ? Talk Newbie856 edit count Nomad guide 20:42, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Martina Scorsby and Music appreciators also do nothing, the only difference is they are a yellow dot and a yellow name rather than a blue name. I'd be fine deleting on terms of notability, but since this VFD is because its name is blue instead of yellow, I vote keep. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
02:17, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Keep - Even the most useless items on RuneScape have a page here. Babyvegeta93 16:18, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
Keep -Yeah, we havve pages on things nnot dissimilair to this, including music appreciators who are a blue dot-the "invisible" is the yellow dot, so, hey, if you delete that one maybe I'll think again. I think the article is fine. -- ile:Runecrafter hat.png Helm360 Talkhiscore 
07:25, October 13, 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep - It is scenery. But because it has such a rich history, I will say keep. Cheers, Chicken7 >talk 07:01, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.