RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Clv309

Christine

Clv309 ^{Talk • Contribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk edits • Edit count}

I nominate Christine for adminship, in spite of the fact that we're flooded with admins, in light of the fact that I believe shewould be a very worthy (and worthwhile) sysop. She definitely is committed to the cause, and she's nice in-person (or as in-person as you can get over the internet); though she does have a temper during debates, I think she's grounded enough to be able to handle it - more than once I've seen her say she'd have said more if she wouldn't get in trouble for it. Oddlyoko ^talk 04:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Current totals

Final Votes:

• Support: 12
• Oppose: 2
• Neutral: 5

I, Clv309, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offense and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban.

Signed,
Christine

Discussion

I really think she deserves this, honestly. Oddlyoko ^talk 04:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, If you mean a little... uneasy at sometimes than ok. But honstly I think your alright. I may change to Support or Oppose later. The King of Fakes 04:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, I'm gonna go with this for 1 day. I'm gonna imagine what wiki will be like if she were sysoped lol. She is a little bit fisty. Patcong ^talk 05:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support, you seem like sysop material to me. =] User:Speckledorph/Sig 05:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, hmm... I really can't decide. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 07:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Weak Oppose, You have not always been polite to other users. --Whiplash 10:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Semi-Support, as I said to Moogel, taking away the fights from your resume would help. But, they are not extremely serious, affecting you horribly. I think once those are gone, then you have an excellent chance of being accepted. Syugecin^spam 11:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Weak Oppose I agree with Whiplash, you were the person who said "screw you, you're just some sissy overly-sensitive bitch" to Blanko. Tesfan 13:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Mhmm. But I've been working on that. Even if you don't believe it. =\ And I'm pretty sure me and Blanko are ok now (I think we are at least). But don't forget what he said to me to spark that response.

Christine 14:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support Christine has shown maturity through honesty and bluntness, and I don't think that's a detractor. That she has been "impolite" to some users in the past has been a combination of this and the fact that she wasn't a sysop. I have no doubt at all that Christine will show level-headedness in heated debates in the future. Moreover, Christine has never sought adminship, meaning that she understands that sysop is not just some graduated user position, but a different role entirely. Endasil (Talk) @ 17:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support I agree with Endasil. Besides, as far as the wiki is concerned, Christine is quick at heading off Vandalism and has good contributions. Talk pages are a little different, but it really doesn't affect the way she would be as a Sysop. I'm all for it. ^TIRRIAN_GANT ^(TALK) 18:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support: I think we're cool now. The King of Fakes 18:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

If Christine can go 1 week without insulting someone il change my vote to full support. --Whiplash 18:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Should be easier with the forums being removed, which is why I've been better recently. They cause too much controversy. Christine 19:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support. She is very helpful especially to new users! Spitfire ^talk 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral Ugh, more sysops that aren't named Cashman286??? This hurts my feelings...maybe I'll go emo. That might be fun. 20:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Commment: Is that really a valid arguement? -.- Christine 22:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I must agree, but maybe he has other, unvoiced reasons. Syugecin^spam 22:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Cashman, will you please state your reasons? And not just because you didn't get sysop? Christine 22:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm changing my vote to Neutral. Tesfan 20:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Support. With all the reason given, do I really need to give another?  Gangsterls  _talk00:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Support Christine is the best! =) She'd make a great sysop. Sure she can be feisty at times, but that's only if you get on her bad side and poke her with a pointy object like a stick or a nail. The Shadow Of Death, Total Rune (Plz don't count out my vote!) _{(Sorry Total.. you can't count. :| )}

*Comments then leaves*, brief eh? If it makes any differance, Sup' Porty! (Ok, not ghetto is me...) Momento Mori _{Real Pain}^{Not Champagne}04:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral not really too sure, as there has been a big fight on your talk page with Blanko. This dude is evil ^{like hell}Korak 15:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

My talk? Christine 15:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I meant Blanko, sorry. This dude is evil ^{like hell}Korak 15:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Mkay, but he said we were cool now, as did I. Christine 16:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

STRONG OPPOSE - Too many people are being sysoped. I think we should stop getting more admins. Chiafriend12Loon is best buttlord 22:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Chiafriend does it really matter how many deserving editors have Adminship? Also don't worry. In a few months or so most of the new editors will probably get bored and disappear. Chaoticar 03:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not gonna do that.. Christine 15:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Support. - Another sysop won't bring the wiki crashing down. She's fit for the job, and it's nice to see someone so candid. --Sαcrε Fι ^{(edit my sig) | (edit my user page)} 04:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

D***it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just typed a 7 paragraph speech of why this does matter! The d**n Wiki update ate it through an edit conflict (not your fault Sacre)!! F*** this. I'm so d**n tired of this d**n update interfering with everything I try to do! I'm officially quitting the Wiki until this d**n update is fixed. Chiafriend12Loon is best buttlord 04:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Chia, please don't quit over something as trivial as a wiki update. And don't complain about it on my RfA. O_O Christine 15:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm not quitting over this one incidint. It's every freaking thing that I'm fed up with! I only said anything about it on this page because it happened on this page. Chiafriend12Loon is best buttlord 23:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Support - Active editor with many high-quality edits. Should've mentioned it earlier. Chaoticar 05:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment - I can't say I've ever seen such a landslide RfA... Oddlyoko ^talk 05:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment Reply - Landslide? As in a lot of supports not a lot of oppose? I think Dtm had the closest to landslide and I had the longest. =P Syugecin^spam 14:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Landslide or not, this is still way more support than I thought I would have when you nominated me Oddly. Christine 14:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Ur like me, pessimistic. *pokes* Syugecin^spam 14:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment: /me agrees, she is pessimistic. XD Christine 14:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Support - Always helping the wiki and doing things that other people would find too boring. A deserving user. Btw, when is she getting sysoped? Look at the overwelming support! Ilyas Talk Contribs 19:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Notice of Intent - User will be sysopped on June 18th due to "Overwhelming support". Oddlyoko ^talk 23:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

As of 19:16, 18 June 2007, Christine has been granted sysop user rights. Oddlyoko ^talk 02:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)