RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Chicken7

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape

Chicken7

Chicken7^{Talk • Contribs • Edit count}

I have to say I was surprised when I realized Chicken is not a sysop here. He has been a very good contributor for a long time. He understands the wiki concepts and acts in good faith. He fights vandalism, and does not get drawn out into edit wars and conflicts with other users. He is a person who would benefit this wiki if he had the extra tools available to sysops. For the wikis sake, he is a good candidate.--Degenret01 13:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I, Chicken7, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, Chicken7 _>talk^>sign

Discussion

• Support - as nominator. Chicken7 makes good use of rollback rights in additon to the other things already said of him. And please for the wikis sake and Chicken7s, do not consider the nominator in this discussion--Degenret01 13:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - There has been a recent wave of vandalism here on this wiki, and Chicken7 certainly has been one of those users who have been helping with the difficult task of trying to root this kind of stuff out. Based on his block nominations and general handling of discussions elsewhere, I can't imagine a better candidate for adminship. --Robert Horning 14:07, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support per Degenret and Robert. When it comes to dealing with vandals, you're no chicken ^_^; earth_(t)
• Support: Per everyone here. Derilith 17:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
• Slightly-stronger-than-average For. I like your contribs and edit count a lot. I see you organizing existing pages, creating new pages, welcoming new users, reverting and reporting vandalism, and more that clearly shows excellent administrator qualities. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by your lord Andorin (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

• Support - He's been around for what is approaching on a year, accumulated not just "a few hundred" edits, but a few thousand. He has no block history, and is a generally good editor. Chiafriend12 00:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - Chicken7's a great editor who has shown both the need for admin tools and the responsibility to use them correctly. Dechaineux ^Talk 08:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - Per Dechaineux. Chicken7's made over a thousand mainspace edits, and a lot of image edits, too.  C Teng ^talk 20:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
• Feed to Cth--I mean, Support - Why not? Planeshifted 21:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - You are the man! Buzz ^{(Talk • # • √ • P )} 06:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - chicken7 is about the nicest guy on the wikia I know. I could almost bet my life saving that he wouldn't abuse his powers as a moderator Rabbadxs 03:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment - Really? Thankyou. Chicken7 _>talk^>RfA 05:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

• Send to KFC No, actually, I support. I've never seen anyone complain about Chicken7 for anything. I've seen many times when he has reverted pages, and reported vandals, and I think he would benefit from administrative powers. Ben^Talk_{Contributions}^Editcount_RfA 06:01, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - You have made very good use of you're roll back rights and you seem to know a lot about the wiki so I think you would be very helpful as an admin. Good Luck! Sir Lenehan 06:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support-By far one of the most deserving editors of these rights. Chicken constantly welcomes new users, improves articles, and is always warm, friendly, (and crispy).-- Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs} 00:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support I think you have what it takes therefore I pledge my support to you. Bob2006ty^{_{(RUNESTORM333)}talk} 10:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment: This already reached consensus, shouldn't he already be sysopped? --Derilith 15:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

RFAs generally last two weeks. He won't be sysopped until the 1st. Dtm142 15:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

• Support - He knows how to deal with vandals and make great contributions. He would benefit from having sysop privileges. Dr5ag2on1 02:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support - Dang! Never once did I think that you were not a sysop! Most new users I've seen have been welcomed by you, and if I were to list all the reasons you should be sysopped, there would have to be sub-pages to hold them all. Chukonu xbow 23:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
• Closed. Chicken7 now has sysop rights. Skill 08:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou very, very much to everyone who supported me and thanks for the kind comments and remarks. I appreciate everything. I will use my powers to the good of the wiki. Chicken7 _>talk^>sign 06:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)