AtlandyEdit

Atlandy ^{Talk • Contribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk edits • Edit count}

Atlandy has been on our wiki for years and never ceased to contribute. he has made loads of edits in help of the community and i think it's time wen reconise this. from the day he welcomed an inexperienced and naive me to today, he has never ceased to do his best to contribute, he is respectful, calm and thinks on his feet all the time, I can't think of a worthier person to be given adminship at this moment, he actively parcitipates in discusstions and always gives his helpful viewpoints, he also never ceased to mark spam articles and vandalism for them to be deleted, Therefore, i truely believe that he should be given the powers of an admin, I trust he will never flaunt this power, In my time on this wiki I have never seen him lost his nerve, and that is something we can all learn from.--Btzkillerv has entered the building! 15:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I, Atlandy, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, ‎Atlandy 15:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

Support - As Nominator (briefly returning from wikibreak) Btzkillerv has entered the building! 15:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

• Comment Can someone direct me to the policies I have to read before I accept‎Atlandy 15:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - You can find a lot of information at RS:ADMIN including how-to guides from the wikipedia, as well as what you can do and guidelines for the RSW. 15:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, as long as you read and agree to what your signing, and you've had a glance at RS:BLOCK, RS:EQUAL, and stuff like that, your good to go --Aburnett001 ^{{Talk} {#}} 15:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Policies--Just be sure your familiar with the policies in there and your all set.--

Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}

15:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - He's one of the calmest people on the Wiki, and I see no reason to oppose this RFA. WWTDD? 15:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support- Huge amount of mainspace edits, very mature, consistent activity, 100% deserving of admin status --Aburnett001 ^{{Talk} {#}} 15:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Has made more edits than most admins. Wow. 15:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Very deserving of this as he has shown his dedication to the encyclopedia.He is very mature, active, and constructive. I feel that he would make great use of the tools provided, and help better the community to make it more enjoyable and beneficial for everyone! 15:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Wow, you aren't a sysop yet, you should have been! =O Buzz ^{(Talk • # • √ • P )} 17:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - I am a fairly new user, but I have come to recognize and respect Atlandy immensely. His rudder runs deep and his course is true. --Hatchenator 18:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support I guess I can't really add anything that hasn't already been said, but I would have assumed Atlandy was already an admin.  :-S Leevclarke ^talk 18:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Long overdue, Atlandy really deserves it as he has done so much for this Wiki. Hurston ^{(T # C)} 23:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per Above -- FORUMMAN _{"Click here!" "Sign here!"} 23:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - per all. Andrew ^talk 02:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per Leevclarke and everyone else. Laser Dragon 02:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Suppoty - If Soldier supports I will too. Kudos 2 U 03:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - I was just waiting for the day. I thought he was against it which is why I never nominated him. 03:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Wouldn't it be great if every one who wanted sysop took the time to read what it is all about first? A great example he sets here. --Degenret01 04:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - He has worked hard, and he should get a reward. Jediadam4 ^(Talk) 04:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you saying that admin is a reward here? Or just that he should get one?--Degenret01 18:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Atlandy has been here for a long time and has made a lot of contributions. He should have been made an admin a long time ago =D. C.Chiam^Talk 10:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per Calebchiam. Look at his number of edits!  Tien  13:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - I assumed you already were an admin, either way you deserve it. Bladeofwar8 ^{Edits Contribs Talk} 19:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - I've seen alot of him. He's mature, responsible, and I do believe that his adminship will be a great benefit to the Wiki. -- Pikaandpi ^{Berserker Fury!}‎ 20:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment - It seems like a landslide win. Must this continue till it's run time has expired? I think it should be implemented soon. Also, the run time is 1 month, why is that? 21:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - A lot of careful thinking here... lots of edits! 00:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - for all the reasons already given Chrislee33 08:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

BIG Time Support - I am glad Atlandy is getting a chance to be an admin. -- Spencer ^{(Talk | Edits | Contribs)} 02:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per all. Very impressive edit count. I Ross I ^Talk 02:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Support per all. Until a short while ago, I actually assumed Atlandy was already an administrator.  C Teng ^talk 20:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - yay! You decided to accept. :P Anyway, per everyone else (btw, this is probably the best consensus ever). Butterman62 (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Support to be honest I don't know why i am doing this cos' you going to suceed any way but hey, you seem to be a good editor, and calm, just getting on with job. Joe Click Here for Awesomeness

Support - Although my vote clearly isn't needed, I have literally been waiting well over a year to be able to vote on this RfA. When I was active, atlandy always did a lot of the grunt work, the monotonous things that others didn't want to do on this wiki. I remember him incessantly putting the {{wpalso}} template on pages, for instance. He's been asked and it's been suggested that he be a sysop so many times, but rather than go for the glory, he waited until he was sure he could fulfill the role properly and actively. This is a trait that I'm sure many will, although not publicly, admit has been lacking from some of the RfAs in the past few months. Atlandy's dedication is worth applauding, and these tools will only increase the good that he can do for the wiki. Christine 10:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment - I've already nominated Atlandy and created this RFA, can I nominate someone else at the same time? Btzkillerv has entered the building! 13:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Yes, you may create as many nominations as you want. C.Chiam^Talk 13:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

No, he can't go crazy with them or no one will take the nominations seriously. Also, this was not the place to ask. Christine 23:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Let me say this clearly: Atlandy would make a great admin. He understands his responsibilities well, and has served our wiki since 2007. I applaud him for his tireless work thus far, and I sincerely believe he will use sysop tools wisely. Atlandy has waited a long time to accept his nomination, and now that he finally has, I wish him the best of luck.   az ^talk   09:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - This is long overdue. Dtm142 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Support - Surprised it has not happened already.  Eternalseed   18:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Officially largest landslide. _ç^o_¬Ø 22:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Let's just sysop him already. :P :D Andrew ^talk 02:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

2nd largest ever...kytti khat had 36

Jeez, look at all these supports. I may as well add my for vote after poking through contribs and edit count. Your contribs are clogged with reverts; do you ever sleep, man? Well, if not, that'll just increase your effectiveness as admin. =D --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 19:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Notice of intent - I'm planning on closing this RFA tomorrow, unless anyone opposes doing so. There's over thirty supports. Laser Dragon 05:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

nominating Atlandy must be the wisest thing i ever done in my entire runescape wiki career... :D Btzkillerv has entered the building! 13:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Closed - Seeing as there is unanimous support and no objection, Atlandy will be granted admin rights.-- 19:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)