RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Archive 5

18:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. 769 edits, but 446 of them are in forums (123), userpages (206), and user talk (117). How did you get 206 user page edits anyway? He has 256 mainspace edits, if anyone was wondering. A couple image, template, project pages. ^GANGSTERLS_talk

Support Syugecin FTW. Plain and simple. A vote for Syugecin will save 1 puppy from being eaten by George Bush! Total Rune01:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! :D

Syugecin^talk

01:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to that IP too? Are you a user? Because you aren't logged in. :P

Syugecin^talk

01:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh ya, and to that IP Address, I'm not an admin yet :P That's why we're voting. so your statement is incorrect.

Syugecin^talk

01:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Could you show me one edit that you feel is a good example of the work you do on the wiki? It will influence my decision. --Wowbagger421 01:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

SupportHmmm....He looks pretty worthy in being a admin. Support it is!

}01:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Support Syugecin would make a great admin. He's done a lot. If anyone deserves it its him

Armyleader36^talk

00:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. He is a nice person. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 46) 20:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

After discussion, my vote is now Neutral. ^GANGSTERLS_talk22:17, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Tentative Support. I would love to see you attempt a rewrite of a "large" article not just making small edits here and there. You're fairly low combat, so help us out with some of the quests, the work you did on Death Plateau (quest) was good, we need more of that and some pics to go with it! Right now my feeling is "I don't see any reason why not", I'm more than happy to change this to a total support if you can demonstrate that you're brave enough to attempt large articles - part of being a sysop is following the style guide etc, and being able to point other users in the right direction. And giving them free-rein when they look like they're coming up with good stuff. --Eucarya ^Talk 22:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Support, per Eucarya.

Megalodon99 _(Talk) ^score 23:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Support. Sαcrε Fι 23:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Look what I found, quite sad....

"==VFA== COuld you vote for me in the votes for adminship? Vote something oppose or support. It doesn't matter just please put something. Syugecin 15:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)"

If you ask, thats a no.

Dreadnought^talk 02:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow Dread, that's pretty harsh. All he asks for is your opinion and you call that begging for votes? Yikes, you run a tight ship. So much for an open-communication community. Endasil (Talk) @ 02:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: Looki here. http://www.wikia.com/wikistats/EN/TablesWikiaRUNESCAPE.htm 230 edits or so in 60 days. I don't think we should admin people that have low amts. of edits and might go inactive, kinda like me. Dreadnought^talk 02:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Not enough edits I'm afraid. Chaoticar 03:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. You haven't been here for long. You haven't made many edits. I think that this wiki is getting too much people who don't understand anything. Total Rune and Cashman support like everyone because theyre nice persons. If more people like that come here then like every 2 days ago arrived noobs will get 10 pointless supports. If that happens, anybody can become a admin! (We should avoid that!) <- If that hurt you, sorry. Changed to neutral later. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 05:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)#

support A great person, and although he hasn't been with us all for long, I still think he deserves recgonition, great rune shop btw. ;-) Bob2006ty^{_{(RUNESTORM333)}talk} 13:21 gmt 27th April

100% support Tesfan 21:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeeeeeeeeeep Whoops... I wanted to see how mad he got. *War chant* And I am Ryugecin I just don't know the pass. >=( Ryugecin(2) 03:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Um... I think that you are inpersonating my brother. He is Ryugecin. Maybe you should reconsider your name. And I don't think I suck or destroy the wiki. Syugecin

^talk_contribs 14:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Support nice guy however hasn't made alot of edits. And be nice guys we don't want to start an argument. --Whiplash 13:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Very Strong Support Just like we all should, he tries his hardest, and is very contructive!

I really haven't seen many major edits from him, and I think we have enough sysops as it is at the moment. Christine 23:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I see... But try Air running Wowbagger and Clv. That's my big rewrite . Also this is getting a bit long =/ Syugecin

^talk_contribs

Have we reached a verdict? Because this is slowing down my computer... =/ Syugecin

^talk_contribs

Support: I see a lot of you on RC. ДҖ--Huanghe63^talk 02:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Extremely Strong support Syu's got the persona, the ability and the qualifications to be a great admin.

Support: I have not been here that long but he seems to be a overall good user, asuming he is a he. Syugecin has been active everyday i have been here. he is kind and appears to be a far person.

John E^blabering_{Th Shop} 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - The rest of the world is moving ahead of me, I might as well pull up and forget it. You know what I'm talking about, Syucegin. Anyways,I think you deserve it.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 19:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I change my vote to Neutral. (Don't ask reason, you all know it.) User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. That's the kind of people for which you should be looking for! He would make a great admin.

Spitfire ^talk 19:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Soft Support. I think that you have the right personality and leadership skills for this, but I do think you could try to be more understanding and less controlling. You could improve as a leader if you tried to be open to criticism and suggestions from subordinates. I do believe that you make good contributions to the wiki and try to help others, especially new users, as much as you can. ^GANGSTERLS_talk02:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

1 googolplex% Support Ryugecin(2) 12:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC) Go SYUGECIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Notice of Intent: Syugecin will be sysoped on May 27th unless there is objection now. --Whiplash 17:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks to everyone who supported me in this campaign. =D Syugecin^spam 22:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey? Is this the longest ever RFA? Syugecin^spam 22:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes it is. Support. Dtm142 23:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Support, wait am i too late?

—Aurora sword (talk • contribs) forgot to sign this comment. 05:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Naw. Ur fine. And who are you btw? 12:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

What the hell? You can't support if no one even knows you.

Christine 18:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Aurora, remember to sign or I apparently flip out. You were way back in the page history -.-

Christine 18:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Lol Christine...I support, as I see no reason not to. Endasil (Talk) @ 20:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I feel stupid now. I was looking in the histoy for an IP or something and saw nothing, then as I found the edit I was like wait.. He changed his sig? Or just forgot..? Its not like Aurora. Ah, well. You all know me well. This is expected I think lol.

Christine 20:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh come on, none of you get the joke? It's Slowpoke. I'm slowpoke, because i was late..

14:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe if I was into pokemon I'd have gotten it.. Sorry lol

Christine 14:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. Not that you seem to need it :P --Wowbagger421 19:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

User "Syugecin " is now a sysop --Whiplash 00:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Gangsterls

Current Votes:

Support - 9
Oppose - 1
Neutral - 1

Well...along the lines of self-nomination, I may as well try it out. I don't know exact numbers, but I think I'm over 1200 total contributions, with over 800 in the mainspace. And, of course, Support. ^GANGSTERLS_talk23:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I Oppose because you can't nominate youself.

04:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

You nominated youself Chia. O_o Christine 11:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Chia thats not a good reason you always have a reason to oppose almost every nomination. I Support Gangsterls because he has contacted me ingame several times to report vandalism so I think he's well suited for this job. --Whiplash 13:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I think you could make a few improvements as a user, including making sure of the correct spelling before correcting others' spelling, but this is not really related to sysop. I think you have the maturity to be a good sysop, just make sure you always evaluate a situation before making an action. Endasil (Talk) @ 15:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I nominated myself, but after my sysopification ^{(that isn't a word is it?)} someone (was it Whiplash? Vimes?) declared that users can't be sysoped when they nominate themselves. I'm only opposing because of that. If I read it wrong and can prove that it says something else, then I'll change my oppose to a pending. But still oppose. Chiafriend 12 17:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. Lots of good edits. If you'd asked, I probably would have nominated you myself. --Wowbagger421 17:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Nobody ever deemed you couldn't. --Whiplash 18:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral. I don't know what to think of you. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 15:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Support Constant Editor Syugecin

^talk_contribs

Support. Omg, you're in the same class as me. 50 less edits than me. 5 days less here than me. And already I'm supporting you? (I mean that if he can be supported, can I be supported too?) User page "Katshuma" Talk page 14:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Strng Support we need more in the wiki like you.

SUPPORT :) What Malestro said! ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 23:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Support 1200 edits? that's enough for me.

05:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral - Hypocritical I admit but until you decide to stay or leave the vote will stay as such. Chaoticar 05:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - Excellent editor, deserves Adminship. Chaoticar 05:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - good edits, lacking a little in the "big" edit kind of thing, but I'm sure you'd be a valuable addition to helping fight vandalism. I think that we should make you a sysop on Monday, 28th May, unless we have objections now. Objecting after the fact is not an option! --Eucarya ^Talk 22:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No objections; you have my support Endasil (Talk) @ 02:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

User "Gangsterls" is now a sysop --Whiplash 15:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Malestro (2)

My Edit Count Closed

Neutral-2
Supports-8
Against-2

Yep I'm going to try again. I have been working hard to improve this wiki. Although my main edits are not over 500 I am constantly monitoring, chatting and participating for the wiki. I will soon reach over 500 edits, but going over 500 when you have nothing actually good to contribute would be bad, so I'll wait till something that needs my editing to come along. I'm EXTREMELY active. _Malestro ^Talk _c0ntr1bs14:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, no reason. Chiafriend 12 14:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, I have to side with Chia on this one. --Whiplash 15:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Also neutral. Certainly not opposed though.

Hyenaste^talk 01:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Well I did major revisions on Emote Article and Emote Enhancers article. I've done revisions on Royal Trouble, Fishing contest, and always monitoring. Please consider my activity since I joined. I've worked hard for this... But it's not my decision. Atleast its not opposes.. :D

15:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Very Soft Oppose It's true, you do a good job here, and I don't really care about the number of edits a person makes, but I'm a little against the self-nominating idea (yes I know it's allowed) for one big reason: who's to say you'll keep editing once you've made this position for yourself? Many want the title of Administrator just for the sake of having the "title", so once you become an admin, what are you going to do? And why do you want to become an Administrator? Convince me that you "deserve" it or that you would do a good job, and give me a reason why you want it. Who knows, you may change my vote. ^TIRRIAN_GANT ^(TALK) 16:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

How dare you judge me like that. I want this title TO HELP. I would never take advantage of it, and I know what being an admin is about... I help run 3 sites! I'm on runescape and wiki more then most of these people. I can't believe you would say something like that! I do all the work I can and it isn't enough. You think I'm just gonna say hey I'm an admin and hop offline? You didn't say that about others I bet. Well listen up... I'd develop systems, I'd BECOME MORE ACTIVE NOT LESS. If you don't like me then be that way. Because this doesn't sound like a fair vote to me! I understood when Emos opposed me. I'm not being rude either. Here's my point: THAT WASN'T A VOTE THAT WAS CRITICISM!

16:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I worked too hard for people to criticize me. Sorry for being harsh, but criticism was all it was. this is why I deserve it. I'm active on here AND THE GAME! I am an admin on 3 other sites and I know how things are run. I know all the rules, I participate in discussions, I vote in simple polls I read and update the news IF I need to. I keep newbies updated. If you look at everything I do and say I don't deserve it, I don't know how its possible to make 'the cut'. :\

17:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, until that I would have given you a Neutral, but that's a definite ~~OPPOSE~~. I will never vote for anyone who can't take criticism. Further, I won't vote for anyone who can't even read the post he's replying to. Tirrian was looking for your motives, not judging you. Take a seat, son, you have too much of a temper. Endasil (Talk) @ 18:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Though I haven't looked enough to give a support, I understand your misunderstanding and withdraw my oppose; I will remain Neutral for now. But I still object to the statement "I worked too hard for people to criticize me": learning from criticism is one of the key things that makes a leader effective, so get used to it. Endasil (Talk) @ 04:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Support, some good work on recent updates, and shows some willingness to help revert/etc. --Eucarya ^Talk 19:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Support -- You deserve it and you've been here a while.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 20:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Criticism I can take, and I did appologize to him on his talk page. What I mean was it sounded like he was accusing me.

I read the apology, no problem, sorry you misunderstood me. I think you would be a good administrator, but I want to know why you want to be one and what the difference would be. Would anything change because you are an administrator? The real question is WHY? If you are going to self-nominate yourself, tell me why, not just the fact that you're qualified. ^TIRRIAN_GANT ^(TALK) 22:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Since you seem worthy I say soft support.

23:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Light Oppose: I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to agree with Tirrian. And I know you do a good job, but maybe you should try, um, again in a month. And, to remind you, sysops can do very little more than a normal user. In general, we edit just the same as you. While it IS handy to have sysops for vandals... Another thing. You're admin on three websites? OK, I've been there too, and I think that's far too much responsibility. It also ties you down to the computer far too much, which can be unhealthy... You're doing a good job on the wiki as it is. Right now, we don't have much need for so many admins, either. So, nothing against you, but I have to say, a very light Oppose, like Tirrian. Oddlyoko ^talk 00:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I got a b'crat vote so I know my worth. :\ Anyway here's how it goes. I've got my life based on computer.. been that way for years, and it will never stop. If Eucarya says I'm worthy that makes me happy... And odd. Have you even been here. No offense but I believe activity is an issue with you... Im on and its 3 AM! :\ e

Support. Sαcrε Fι 01:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Chia Mark out your old vote! :D

Sorry, you haven't convinced me yet. Admin and b'crats are not "Ranks". So "I got a b'crat vote so I know my worth" doesn't mean a thing. More and more of your comments are telling me that I made a good decision in opposing, so I will continue to do so. Just keep editing well, like you've been doing, don't worry about the "Prestige" of Adminship. ^TIRRIAN_GANT ^(TALK) 14:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. Me is ready to support!

Support. ДҖ--Huanghe63^talk 02:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Support good job. Syugecin

^talk_contribs 02:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

~~Whats the two there for?~~

13:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I know. _Malestro ^Talk _c0ntr1bs14:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Support I guess looking back you've never made any bad edits. Haven't seen you report vandalism alot but I don't think you would do anything against the intrests of the wiki. --Whiplash 09:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Its been 2 weeks!! :D

13:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

That it has. Oddlyoko ^talk 16:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Um, this may just be nit-picking, but aren't we supposed to have a notice of intent and then a few more days of voting? Obviously it's too late in this case, but still... Endasil (Talk) @ 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Stinkowing

Final Votes:

Support - 5
Oppose - 1
Neutral - 1

I'm not sure if I'd make a good sysop...but I'm not letting that stop me from trying! I'm not as well known as Chia or Whiplash, but I'm still active (in fact, I'm planning for another Wiki-meetup soon...), and I've mainly gotten into editing my userpage and subpages, but I still make fairly decent edits to the mainspace. Though I got a bit ticked off at Total Rune's brother (for spamming about MoparScape) and the recent vandal from my school) I can still keep my cool. I will admit, though, that I am a bit nervous doing this...maybe it's because of the self-nominating thing that I'm so confused about. Stinkowing _{(WHAT'S IN IT?)}

Oppose No self nominating. Total Rune00:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

If you read the conversation on the RFA talk page, you would know what's going on with that.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I did. They're talking about getting rid of that self-nominating rule (that's what I interprit anyway).I don't quite understand it, though. Besides, Chia did his this way too.

Oppose x2 I don't care how Chia did it. He cheated. You phail. Total Rune00:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

A bit angry, are we?

God Dammit! 4 edit conflicts. Ok, I was saying... Not you stinkowing, I was talking to total rune.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose x3 If at first you don't succeed, YOU PHAIL. =D Total Rune00:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Will you shut the hell up? Just because you didn't make it doesn't mean that you can intimidate other people and bother them. I suggest you calm down and sip some tea. If that doesn't help, just take a week or 2 away from the wiki.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Who's saying I haven't made it? Total Rune00:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

*sigh*... Whatever.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

With an additude like that, Total, you DEFINITLEY won't make it. I mean no offence, but you are one heck of an angry mastodon.

You really think I give 2 sh*ts whether I make it or not? Hell no. Total Rune00:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

OMG. Isn't this a voting zone? Not an argue zone? Anyway Support Syugecin^talk_contribs

I'm not 'upposed ta eat da legos..... =( Total Rune00:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

And that has to do with what, now? (BTW, even if you WERE supposed to eat the Legos, they'd tear up your stomach...

Okey-dokey then.... Syugecin

^talk_contribs and I eat legos too

Look! There's Syugecin! *waves* HI SYUGECIN! Total Rune00:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Woah, this is really delayed, but the no-self-nominating-rule-thing wasn't created until after I was sysoped. Chiafriend 12 02:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. You are well-known to me! :) And total rune...you are just asking to get a month's block off the wiki. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 16:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral. No reason. ^^ User page "Katshuma" Talk page 14:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Support.-- _Malestro ^Talk _c0ntr1bs15:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Support I thought you were a sysop already. In my eyes I think you have the admin kind of cut...if you know what I mean... 05:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Question.. should total rune votes count now? _Malestro ^Talk _c0ntr1bs14:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - I expected you to be a sysop before I would be. I think you shouldve been made a sysop before I was made one. Chiafriend 12 14:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I say, not enough support votes to become admin. (And with the number we have currently, and the current work on the RfA system...) Maybe after the RfA system is fixed up? Oddlyoko ^talk 23:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I have five votes...what's the minimum (yes I really do have five, I counted)

You're right, you've got 5. Syu's vote isn't very easily seen. I'd say 9 is the minimum, with a 3:1 or better support-to-oppose ratio. (that means you need at minimum 9 supports and 3 opposes) Oddlyoko ^talk 00:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you should try again after the RfA system has been fixed up and RfA's are opened up again. Want me to close and archive this? You are over the 2 week limit anyways. Oddlyoko ^talk 00:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Do as you wish.

Mr Pker

I want to be an admin because I have removed a few vandals posts and warned them on their talk pages, like the ip address that signed as xx echo x3 or something like that. I am really active on the forums and I like welcoming new users to the wiki. i like cleaning after the vandals like a janitor. Please vote for friendly neighborhood Mr Pker =). Please vote for me to be a forum admin at least.

Final Votes

Support - 0

Oppose - 8

Neutral - 0

I must say... Hesitant Oppose. You aren't well known. Plus, I figured out that there is no such thing as only a forum sysop... =/ Syugecin

^talk_contribs 01:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

NEUTRAL - You aren't well known, and there isn't currently no such thing as forum sysop, but there may be eventually. Chiafriend 12 02:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

OpposeI do think you would make a good forum mod. As for a admin... well, youve only made 2 mainspace edits. Tesfan 12:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. Megalodon99 _(Talk) ^score 12:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. Chiafriend 12 14:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose :( Per above... Sorry you had to be my first oppose... ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 00:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Ditto for me, unless a position as Forum Mod can be created. Chaoticar 05:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Agree with Tesfan. 2 mainspace edits is not good enough to even qualify for an admin. Sorry man, but, you're just not good enough. Emosworld 06:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Per above. I think we can safely close this RfA. Oddlyoko ^talk 23:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Patcong (2)

Final Votes:

Support - 4

Oppose - 5

Neutral - 1

Ummmm....I was told I can nominate myself here here it goes...(Crosses two fingers) Patcong ^talk 00:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

SOFT OPPOSE - You seem very worthy of adminship, but you had a 2 week break, just got back, and I think it's a bit soon after to have been gone. Translation: You were inactive, came back, and should wait a bit (just my opinion.).

01:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Heh. Maybe get active again and it'll work. For now, Light oppose Syugecin^spam 11:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I am active.

21:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you are, but you just got back. I'll support once time gets around to going to 00:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 'cus then you would've been back for a week or so.

23:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral =\ ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 23:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose, Well, you were quite active, but I don't think that alone is enough admin quality. You seem to be quite hotheaded anyway. I've seen and had arguments with you, so, you know...

05:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think hot headed is the right word. You don't see me having an outbreak once and a while lol. Plus I am friendly as long you get to know you well. I'm really nice to syugecin, total rune, cashman, moogle(Yep we're friends now=D) and many many others outside of wiki. I think I missed a couple of people of wiki but you get the picture.

00:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Support Patcong is a great editor, and he has a sense of humor to go along with it. Woohoo for Patcong!!! Talk-to Cashman286(Level 50) 20:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you mate! Finally I got a support lol.

20:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Support!! I change my mind! I support! =D ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 04:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

SUPPORT He is a good friend, and is always friendly. He would make a good admin.

Guthix Crusader

Website 23:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks all of you gus and moogel sorry about what happened to us a long time ago.

23:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Support... Um.. I thought you already were one or I would have nominated you myself. :)

14:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

~~Yeah, this is 23 hours late, but SUPPORT! Chiafriend 12 23:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)~~

Yay! Seems like it's going pretty good. Not many people voting for me though.=(

23:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral now I've come to the conclusion that there is already too many sysops.

00:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Awww man...*crys* Patcong ^talk 01:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Too many Sys-Ops i think. Chaoticar 05:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

True they're many but some of them aren't on all the time. I usually on the whole day except the weekends. Plus I noticed a little lack. They take about 5-10 minutes noticing a page has been vandaled or there is an vandalism. I always I mean Always click on recent changes. Thats why I have so much edits on forums lol. About 1 minute it the page has already been reverted and ehh sometimes i report it. So that means I I were an admin I would be quick so the vandal can't do nothin.

00:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes but my main point is:Once the thrill of Adminship wears off, in a few months time will you still be active on the Wiki? Chaoticar 03:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. Sorry, but I think you're not ready. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 05:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. As above.

Emosworld

00:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. When you don't get your way you call everyone else annoying and quit? An admin should be more mature than that. --Wowbagger421 00:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Is someone who says "screw it" to the wiki really worthy of admin powers?

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 14:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Cashman286 (3)

Support – 4

Oppose – 7

Neutral - 0

I just made my 500th edit, and I am seeking sysop powers. As I covered this already, people will oppose for this reason or that, but as long as I get an idea of what the community thinks of me, I'll be fine. Just 1 bit of advice: I'd like you to support intead of oppose. Cashman286^talk contribs editcount my RFA 16:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - I think you really deserve it. You're a helpful contributor, a positive voice, you help people not so experienced, you have a large presence in the wiki and on the forums and you're always doing what's right.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 16:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

SupportAwesome editor and good friend. He deserves the sysop powers!

17:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Pending I dunno, on 1 hand, you don't have that many edits, only 59 mainspace edits, but I know its not just about the edits, so im not going to say oppose or support just yet. Tesfan 18:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

OPPOSE - Not that I think you're bad, but you only have 59 mainspace edits (said above) and only 500 total edits. I think all admins should have 1,000 edits atleast, and 300 mainspace edits. Also, we are gettting to have a lot of admins, I might start saying we have too many. Chiafriend 12 23:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. Tesfan 03:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above Chaoticar 03:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose what would have invalidated the vote that just ended? I would think a failed vote would be a sign to you to wait for at least a month, not 5 minutes (literally)...This is just getting ridiculous. Endasil (Talk) @ 12:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

*cries* That's not very nice. =-( And I thought I had about 69-70 something mainspace edits. Either way, I won't mention any names, but I'm not very impressed with some---not all---some of our newest sysops, and if these people can make it, I think I deserve it, too. I've been trying to keep my composure, but this is too one-sided. I wanted an archive because I just reached a good milestone. Cashman286^talk contribs editcount my RFA 12:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Who is that directed at? Tesfan 14:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

And great. I get even more god damned opposes than the last time. Cashman286^talk contribs editcount my RFA 12:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 12:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh my god, you people hate me. You support everyone else just because they have more mainspace edits than me. But should it really matter? I say no! Mainspace edits don't mean anything if the user is a total jerk. I don't see why some of you are so prejudiced against people with few article edits. It's irrational, it's ridiculous how one user decided that people with not many mainspace edits are looked down on. It seems like if this serial killer got 1000 main edits, they would sysop him! But what if a really nice guy had only, say, 70 mainspace edits. No chance at all. It also seems that everyone who supported me previously either opposes now (with the exception of Ilyas) or doesn't vote at all. I am so fed up with these stupid "per above" votes, since that is no reason to oppose! I am pissed off. But nobody can understand what I would do for the wiki if they would just sysop me! I also really want to see previous discussions of deleted pages, but being normal doesn't let me do that! If there was a huge vandal attack like on April 19th, you can't rely on me. I can't do squat about it. To sum it up, These are sucky reasons to oppose me. Wow, that felt good to let put my anger, even if it did take me 10 minutes... Cashman286^talk contribs editcount my RFA 18:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't know you that well, so I can't say support because "your a nice person". There are 100's of nice people on this wiki, all who would benifit from being a syops. Why should you be one? (That's not an attack, it's a question). Tesfan 19:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Because it seems that everyone is being sysoped now, and I don't wanna be left out. Cashman286^talk contribs editcount my RFA 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't feel a particular urge to vote.. But as Whiplash has created an offsite forums, I think it is safe to let Cashman get a big, hearty, support. Syugecin^spam 00:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

~~I say oppose! Not enough edits!~~ I mean... Erm, I mean... ~~I support! He's a friendly contributor!~~ Ugh... ~~Pending~~... No, NEUTRAL! >_< ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 18:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Alrighty, I decided on SUPPORT. Edits aren't everything. =D ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 23:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. You've only really been editing for a bit over two months, your mainspace edits are unimpressive, and you don't seem to be able to take criticism. --Wowbagger421 00:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I hate this...I'm screwed for life on RFAs because of my bad temper. I hate being criticized because it's never constructive. It's just meant to insult me. 13:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Well not eveyone hates you. I think you deserve it. =)(=

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 14:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Your edits aren't all that impressive, and you seem too eager to jump into being a sysop. To be honest, your attitude isn't the best, mostly from what I've seen on RFA pages. I think we have enough for the time being as well - it does seem like everyone is being sysop'd these days. AScott00 21:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

See the (3) part in the nomination? He's waited and tried again. Infact, he was part of the origional RFA surge in february and he was one of the only ones who never made it. Oh and do you have to speak in that tone to a person who already seems upset?

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 22:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

What tone? He was giving his honest opinion. Seriously Ilyas, this is about the community deciding on something that matters, not us just handing out sysop to everyone who's feelings might be hurt. We need to readjust our priorities. Scott, thank you for your opinion. Endasil (Talk) @ 22:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I think you misinterperated my comment. I am not enforcing the random handout of sysop powers nor am I suggesting that we give them to anyone who seems to be having a rough time or is in depression. I am merely saying that, when the RFA fad broke out in mid February 2007, Cashman was one of the users who enlisted his nomination in the page, or am I confused with another user. His nomination was then declined as he and few others watched random users become sysops. Only a fraction of them actualy deserved them. I'm steering away from names. Cashman then reopened his nomination with the same hopes as evey other user who has ever self-nominated or ever even accepted their nomination, becoming a sysop. However, it was, once again, turned down and he remained a normal user. He waited and re-opened it once more. That's the present nomination. If everyone is to harrass him and become angered at him for nominating himself again, he has the right to be respected. However, you seem to think I am saying he should be granted administrative powers for that reason and that reason alone (?), which is not what I am arguing about.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 22:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

But no ones harassing him. --Wowbagger421 23:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I'm doing a bad job explaining this but you're missing the point. Nobody is directly harrassing him but with the comments made, it gives the person who's vote is support that they are indeed (if not so then indirectly). You seem to disagree with me on the matter and so I'll leave it there because it's not going to change anyone's vote and if it even should be held (which it really shouldn't), such should be done elsewhere (another page). I don't want to offend anyone or to be offended so let's drop it here.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 23:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Actualy, Endasil it's 7 minutes to be exact.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Two minutes make all the difference, and I'm not being sarcastic. And I must say, I think you guys are just saying this crap because you got your sysop powers during that surge. You think that you shouldn't care, you got what you wanted, so who cares about other people's feelings if I got my stupid self-gratification! If you got brutally declined like this, you'd be just like me. Don't deny anything---you know it. I thank Ilyas for sticking up for me, but I think I'm gonna close this RFA until further notice, possibly I will nominate myself again (Cashman286 (4) That would sure be something.) in mid-June, early July if other sh** happens. Now, see what happens when you people oppose me? It turns into an argument and the only loser here is me, and my self-esteem goes down a notch or two. I'm not respected here, or in real life, so why do you guys have to be so hard on me? 3 and a half months I've been here, helping this wiki to become a better place, but all I get is this. Some thanks for following all the rules and being a good citizen. And eager? I'm freaking 11, for god's sake! I'm undergoing all of these moodswings, and still acting a little kiddish. Just cut me some slack, people! This is just too much!!! And yes, this RFA is closed until further notice. 00:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

I got mine a month or so before, some people don't even have them and no, I don't think people are talking crap for that reason.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 00:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Tesfan

Result: Wait a little while.
Final Votes:

Support – 6
Oppose – 0
Neutral - 3

I am going to go ahead and nominate myself. For quick reference, my edit count is here and my contributions are here. I have almost 700 mainspace edits, and almost 1,500 total edits. I have made 6 pages, and while some of my edits will be minor, I have also made some bigger edits, such as adding the “runes required” table to the lunar spells table.

Why do I want to become an admin? Two reasons:

1. The ability to delete unwanted pages: One good example is when my friend, kathooloo2, posted a thread in the market place. He then later asked for it to be deleted, and I put up a speedy deletion tag on it. I checked back 4 days later, and it was still there. I do not think this would happen as often if I were an admin.

2. The ability to stop vandals: I check the recent changes almost all the time when I am on the computer, even when I am playing RuneScape. I was there when the infamous Buck Nell vandal was there. Buck Nell went on a vandalizing rampage, and blanked at least 15 pages and vandalized for at least 10 minuets (I know 10 minuets doesn’t seem like a lot of time, but trust me, when a vandal is on runescape wiki, 10 minuets seems like forever) before a admin could block him. All the while I could do nothing but undo page after page while Buck Nell continued to vandalize the wiki. Again, I do not think this would not happen as often if I were an admin. Tesfan 23:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Support! Nice going Tesfan!

23:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

SUPPORT x300! What a completely unexpected surprise...It's a about time! =D ^{The Nifty One,} Speckle 00:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Support, albeit reluctant only because I think we have too many sysops. Still, count it as a Support, because I think you're worthy of adminship. Oddlyoko ^talk 00:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Support!

14:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Ekk... I don't know. Neutral for now. I want to say there are bit many admins. Plus, a couple have come back. I think you are ready but I'm not ready to say anything quite yet. Syugecin^spam 14:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, per above. Chiafriend 12 23:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment If you think that is the case, then why did you vote for patcong?Tesfan 23:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh LOL, I forgot about that. I voted for him about 3 minutes before I did for you.

00:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Support User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Support Ebany of the Fakes 11:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral I think you deserve the powers, but I think you should wait a month or two, I didn't get sysoped and I've been here for longer than you have. 12:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment: How long you're here doesn't necessarily mean that you deserve the powers.

Christine 10:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

While you've got enough votes, I think you should wait a little while, until the wiki settles a little. We're still working on the RfA process and the forum move. If you really want to try for it now, add me in-game (RSN: Oddlyoko) and I'll "interview" you, and consult the other b'crats. (Which would probably be a good process in the long run anyways) Oddlyoko ^talk 04:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

I am fine with waiting. Tesfan 23:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Requests for Bureaucrat

Sacre Fi

Rationale:

Why do we need another bureaucrat? Vimescarrot and Eucarya have both announced their intentions to take a step back from the Wiki. With the loss of activity from these two, we lost two of the most influential voices on the Wiki. You can toss around the "all editors are equal" policy around as much as you want, but that will not negate the fact that people listen to bureaucrats more than others. Why? Because bureaucrats have more experience and are clearly more trusted by the community as a whole.

I have noticed that as a community, we have been reduced to a group of bickering editors, with people turning a community-based project into an arena for personal attacks and unrelated banter. I believe another active bureaucrat, complementing Whiplash's recent promotion, will help bring some focus back to the Wiki.

Why Sacre Fi? Sacre Fi has gained respect within the community as evidenced by his recent promotion to sysop. People use adjectives like "helpful" and "guiding" when describing Sacre. Even more important, Sacre has proven himself able to keep his head in absolutely every situation. While most editors despise and try to ban those who vandalize, Sacre will presume innocence and actually invite those very people to join the community in a meaningful way. On top of all this, Sacre is very well-spoken and clear. I trust his judgment more than anyone else on the Wiki, and believe that he has every ability to perform the highest level duties.

If Sacre Fi accepts this nomination, I open the door for discussion. Endasil (Talk) @ 02:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, people keep forgetting my nomination as a vote, so formally I say support. Endasil (Talk) @ 23:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Final Votes

Support - 13

Oppose - 4

Neutral - 2

I accept! :) Sαcrε Fι 03:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I Oppose - Three reasons:

1) I've been here longer than Sacre, and I don't think I've been here long enough.
2) Whip was just b'cratted, I think we should have some down time before 'cratting somone else.
3) I think that we don't need any more b'crats.

03:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't mean to argue, but:

1) Time doesn't exactly make the editor; it really depends on the trustworthiness and responsibility of the editor (neither are qualities I hold). =0
2) Would it make any difference if a person was elected to bureaucrat a month after another instead of a week?
3) Um... =\

Sαcrε Fι 04:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - No offense but after Whip's 'cratting I don't think we need another 'crat. Chaoticar 08:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment. We only have one really active crat, and you're saying we have too many? Hmm. I've been gone too long to comment, but Sacre certainly seemed like an ideal candidate for cratship. (Note: I'm assuming Hyenaste is still barely semi-active and that Eucarya realy is stepping back.) JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 09:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I say Support until otherwise noted. Syugecin

^talk_contribs

I really Support Sacre! ^Go! Go! Go! Go! User page "Katshuma" Talk page 12:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Slightly sad support - I guess I will spend my days as a lowly admin. Sacre is great at convincing vandals to act nice, and he deserves this. Megalodon99 _(Talk) ^score 12:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Support great intelligent user. --Whiplash 14:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Just be happy you are an admin, and Support. You are worthy of the power. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 22:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. If my being the first - or the second, not sure if X1101 or whatever the numbers where was one before me - b'crat makes any difference, I say Sacre deseves it. I see him (her?) talked about as a good person with good edits, which rules out your reason 1 for opposing - whatever else you might say, Sacre! - and I think we could use another b'crat. Considering Vimes and Eucarya are supposedly stepping back a bit - them being great editors, that will be a sore loss - we could use Sacre Fi. :) Oddlyoko 23:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't mean to be stubborn (even though I am) but this supports my reason #3 even more. Oddlyoko came back so we have another crat. Chiafriend 12 23:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Chia, could you just this one time justify yourself? I mean, you object on these grounds but don't say why. Why do we not need another bureaucrat? I have fully justified my reasons for believing we need another bureaucrat, what is your justification? Endasil (Talk) @ 04:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

We have 3.5 b'crats here. Oddlyoko, Whip, Hyenaste, and Eucarya (but I heard he's leaving so that's a 0.5). 3 people alone can handle sysoping people and every other b'crat thing. Everyone has their own opinion, and with frredom of speach I can say my opinion. We have like 25 editors here (not including forum only editors), so with 3 active b'crats that's 12% of this wiki being a b'crat. With Sacre being b'cratted, that'd make it 17%. It would go from about 1/10 to 1/5.

It's not that I don't like Sacre, he is a swell man and editor, but I just think we have enough b'crats. And with freedom of speach and vote I can say my opinion and vote accordingly to my opinion.

14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Do not mistake my call for justification as an attack on your rights Chia. I never said you weren't entitled to your opinion. On the contrary, I was trying to see if there was a reason behind that opinion, and you have given it. Just because someone asks you to justify yourself does not mean they don't respect your opinion. Usually it's the opposite, they respect your opinion enough to try to make an effort to see your point of view. So cut it out with this "I'm allowed to disagree cause it's my right" crap. And I do appreciate that you have stated your reasons for that opinion, don't get me wrong. Endasil (Talk) @ 20:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support I've been impressed with everything that Sacre Fi does, and although some think we have too many b'crats, why not have another? What would it hurt? Sacre Fi certainly qualifies in many ways, would do a good job, and so far I haven't heard a strong enough reason why he should NOT become a b'crat. It wouldn't bother me one bit. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, I just don't necessarily agree with some of those opinions. ^TIRRIAN_GANT ^(TALK)16:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose -- I'm sorry, you're a great editor and all but Oddlyoko just returned and Whiplash was cratted over the weekend. Do we really need 7 crats, 6 of which are active? I think we have enough.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 22:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - I recently sent my RFA on a crash collision into Opposed-ness....and I've made amends with everyone.....and ever since I swirlied my brother and came to the wiki, Sacre Fi was there....through thick and thin, he was there. Sacre, this Support is for you man, you're the bomb. Total Rune22:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I just realized that I can connect to Mega on what he said...

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 22:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Note:Bureaucrats are, according to the above rules, supposed to be nominated by Bureaucrats, not Admins or ordinary Users. Chaoticar 08:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Does that mean that we have to stop this? <:O

14:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

No. --Whiplash 15:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice try. First, it says "in most cases", which really doesn't mean much, and second, two bureaucrats have already given their support so it really doesn't matter who initiated the nomination. Endasil (Talk) @ 15:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean 'nice try'? I was just pointing it out. Just because I point out a fact, doesn't mean I'm attempting to derail his Nomination or something. Chaoticar 04:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Agreeing with Endasil here, but without the "nice try". Oddlyoko ^talk 04:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually, my "nice try" was directed to Chia, whose post I was responding to. It looked like he was going to try to take the easy way to a failed nomination. The point was valid and I'm glad you brought it up. While I'm responding, I've noticed that everyone who has opposed so far has only opposed on the grounds that there are too many 'crats already. If this were not the case, and you agreed that we needed another bureaucrat, could you shed some light on your opinion of Sacre as the next 'crat? Endasil (Talk) @ 18:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

With the surge in RFA I can assume taht some people just think this would go along the lines of an adminship request. However, a crat is a much more complicated thing. My vote still remains Oppose - All to respect.

Ilyas

Talk Contribs 20:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I hope this doesn't hurt Sacre's feelings (it's not supposed to), but I think some more experienced admins should become a b'crat for having more experience. Chiafriend 12 14:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

No offense taken. :) What experience might I be missing? The amount of time spent here? Sαcrε Fι 19:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Very Weak yet still Oppose-Like chia said, Whiplash has just became a beauracrat, and I trust strongly in whiplash. Creating more and more of these will just be a swarm of flies and not as important. Vimescarrot has left, and all... But I believe Whiplash can handle it. Sacrefi would be a great addition to the Beaurecrats, but NOT NOW. Also to edit well you need to play well, and Sacrefi has a lack of activity on the game. He would just be a voice, and not that much of an editor.