## FANDOM

43,953 Pages

 Archive directory Delisting archive Replacement archive Obsolete archive 20 21 22 23

## Successful nominations

### The Postcat

Description: Not a talking skull.
Reason: cute cat

• Support - please help me with the description Iiii I I I 05:39, June 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - cute. 15:18, June 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - 16:32, June 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - neither rain, nor sleet, nor blistering sand storms will keep this cat from its appointed rounds --Deltaslug (talk) 16:20, June 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. I'm just going to use the description for now, feel free to update it if anyone comes up with a better one. --LiquidTalk 00:55, June 29, 2017 (UTC)

### Death's office

Description: Where Harold the Grim Reaper is found during working hours.
Reason: Looks pretty cool and things.

• Support - As nominator. 08:33, July 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - 18:54, July 8, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:27, July 14, 2017 (UTC)

### Harmony Island

Description: A tranquil Saradominist islet in the Eastern Sea, with only minor zombie pirate invasions.
Reason: Looks pretty neat as a thumb, and the composition is really nice, what with the ship and the church.

• Support - As nominator. 11:58, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Yay harmony island! Now just add a flower patch to protect the allotments and I may come around more often. --LiquidTalk 15:47, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 00:30, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

### Shattered Worlds

Description: A small safety haven in the chaotic fabrics of the Abyss.
Reason: I thought it looked surprisingly nice, especially with the skybox. Nice way of showing off a recent update too.

• Support - As nominator. 07:46, July 19, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Uploaded new version taken from NXT client, so now it looks even better, maintained same angle too. 14:26, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
You should've done that after the nomination closed, per policy, but since it's pretty much exactly the same, it probably doesn't matter in this case. And by 'pretty much exactly' I mean 'literally exactly except it's darker' :P. Edit: actually, comparing the two, it's a lot darker...can't you turn off LD or increase brightness or summat? If not, I propose the original version be used, because this is just too dark. :( 14:51, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
Lighting on it is fine, it's not too dark, besides it wouldn't properly represent how the area looks if I turned some settings off just to make it "brighter". As for one main difference between the Java and NXT version, the skybox has a much higher texture than that on the Java client. 15:18, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - NXT version. 15:19, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose current version - Much too dark and monotonous to look good thumbnailed. The previous version did not have this problem. ʞooɔ 03:39, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
Could potentially have it show a different type of environment for the checkpoint, as this is how the darkmeyer theme looks ingame. 12:00, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
Just grabbed one from a different environment setting than Darkmeyer, which is much brighter and can bee seen here. 13:27, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
Works for me, or you could just turn off LD... (or use my original version - the skybox differences aren't noticeable) 14:16, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
LD on NXT only turns off the lighting effects emitting from various sources like the portals, it does not make the area brighter. Here's a comparison showing the Freneskae environment with LD on Ultra and with it on low. Also the skybox difference between your version and the one I've uploaded is extremely noticable 14:38, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
Was not aware, point taken. And I hadn't noticed the difference until you pointed it out, to be frank. :( Can always artifically play with brightness and contrast in GIMP I guess, but as Cook said, the previous version's brightness is fine. Only the skybox is of lesser quality, but at least that is not noticeable at all when thumb'd. So a choice between two evils, I guess. 20:37, July 21, 2017 (UTC)

Closed - Image will be featured. I think the greatest consensus would be around this image - it's brighter to make Cook and Fswe happy, it's NXT to make Isobel happy, and it's one of Tony's to make him happy. --LiquidTalk 02:37, July 26, 2017 (UTC)

### Master runecrafter robes

Description: The specialised apparel of a true pioneer in Runecrafting research.
Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the robes look very vibrant and colourful and are very much FIMG material what with the unique skirt and the pretty details like the talismans and the goggles.

• Support - As nominator. 08:29, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Nice, stereotypical mage looking set -- 11:48, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Details in the outfit are nice. It looks like the hat is chopped off though :/. Haidro (talk) 01:24, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Crosed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:53, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Mobilising Armies

Reason: It looks bloody amazing, that's the reason, :P. I've wanted to have an image of this for ages and finally I've succeeded in getting one - a fairly decent one too if I say so myself.

• Support - As nominator. 14:03, September 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Extended - Someone's gotta have some opinion... --LiquidTalk 22:58, September 16, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Nice picture of a cool looking castle, can't see why not -- 13:38, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - --Iiii I I I 18:33, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Question - What happens to the pic if Jagex opts to remove mobilizing armies? --Deltaslug (talk) 01:19, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
I wouldn't worry too much about that, I doubt they'd actually go through with it. But, to answer the question, it would get automatically delisted two weeks after the removal, or earlier if someone makes a discussion. Per Forum:Obsolete featured images, obsolete FIMGs are automatically delisted two weeks after they're made obsolete if no suitable replacement passes an FIMG nomination, and since removal means there can be no replacement by definition, it'd be removed. --LiquidTalk 04:35, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
What? It's be historical, not obsolete. We have at least one other historical image featured. 06:18, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
Did somebody say historical featured images? 09:02, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, well, the standard per that thread is that the image has to be of such historical significance that it continues to add to the page. So, I guess you are correct. Unless we delete the mobilizing armies article, the image will remain featured. My bad. --LiquidTalk 19:47, September 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 04:55, September 24, 2017 (UTC)

### Newton

Description: Cute newt.
Reason: Cute pet, lovely .gif by Mime.

• Support - As nominator 11:19, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Looks perfect as a gif. 17:17, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - If you look closely, you can see where it actually ends as I probs added a frame too much. - Jr Mime (talk) [VSTF] 23:46, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose the greenscreen ground - it looks terrible here and defeats the purpose of chroma key. The banding in the sky is also not ideal, but I guess it can't be avoided with the gif format. I'd support if this was retaken to either use a different (normal) ground texture or exclude the ground completely. --Iiii I I I 04:55, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - No gif has ever been featured - if we want to do that, some guidelines have to be established. That aside, the viciously vibrant greenscreen in the corner kills this for me. 17:05, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
What guidelines would we need for .gifs? 06:47, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
Whether they're allowed or not, dimensions, how to treat quasi-obsolete ones (e.g. pre-EoC player model, but animation of interest hasn't changed), ... 08:18, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
Presumably we wouldn't feature either images or gifs that had outdated player models, because we shouldn't be featuring things that need to be retaken. As for dimensions, aren't all featured images resized into the box on the mainpage? I don't think there's much we need to establish for .gifs to be featured, but if you want to make a proposal about it then go ahead. 09:59, November 27, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - Uploaded new GIF without the green floor. Can't do much about the guidelines and the sky. - Jr Mime (talk) [VSTF] 00:35, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - How about retaking it in The White Hole so that maybe it will match a white wiki background? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 08:54, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - The animation has since been updated to remove the green background 20:48, November 24, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Looks awesome. :) 12:39, November 27, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 01:01, December 7, 2017 (UTC)

### Salawa akh

Description: Sample description.
Reason: Nice pattern dog, good translucency, is good boy.

• Support - As nominator 11:31, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Hotdog - Jr Mime (talk) [VSTF] 01:58, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Support --Iiii I I I 04:57, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Surprisingly nice. Unlike the provided reason and description. :P 17:08, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - That's a good boy. :) 12:40, November 27, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 01:07, December 7, 2017 (UTC)

### Khopesh of Tumeken

Description: An ancient blade dropped by the Magister, detailed with inscriptions towards the God of the Sun.
Reason: cool design

• Support - As nominator Iiii I I I 00:01, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - 11:20, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - 22:10, January 22, 2018 (UTC)
• Closed - successful. --Iiii I I I 09:42, January 28, 2018 (UTC)

### Witch's experiment

Description: A shapeshifting monster produced from Nora T. Hagg's experiments. His name is Fritz.
Reason: bwuk bwuk bwuk

• Support - As nominator Iiii I I I 06:55, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - Purple! 10:52, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - it's a purple chicken. 11:21, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
• Closed - successful. --Iiii I I I 09:42, January 28, 2018 (UTC)

### Hydrix bakriminel bolts (e)

Description: Enchanted hydrix tipped bakriminel bolts with a devastating deathmark effect.
Reason: Pretty colours and feathering.

• Support - As nominator 11:50, January 23, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - As
• Support - 13:40, February 6, 2018 (UTC)
• Closed - This image will become a featured image. 16:37, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

### File:Yakaminu pet.png

Description: Water snek.
Reason: Good image, good editing.

• Support - As nominator 14:58, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - It is pretty. 16:42, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - Looks good 20:04, March 8, 2018 (UTC)
• Support --Iiii I I I 21:58, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be featured. --LiquidTalk 02:00, March 17, 2018 (UTC)

## Unsuccessful nominations

### Barrelchest

Description: Mi-Gor's fearsome zombio-mechanical monstrosity. With googley eyes.
Reason: Great angle, making it really loom over you. The brain's cute, too. And we have few images of NPCs/monsters featured.

• Support - As nominator. 17:40, July 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - dull greenish-brown colors, with graphics from 2009. --Iiii I I I 18:43, July 11, 2017 (UTC)
2007 actually, but who cares, it looks awesome. :D 09:29, July 12, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - I don't think we have the same definition of cute. --LiquidTalk 19:02, July 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Not the best looking NPC to be featured. 13:46, July 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 15:44, July 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Wahisietel

Description: A wise Zarosian Mahjarrat defending himself at the Ritual of Rejuvenation.
Reason: Look at it, it's flipping amazing. Oh and more NPCs featured is always nice.

• Support - As nominator. 12:02, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
• Meh - its a nice pose/angle but the image was taken nearly 6 years ago. The model looks a little dated: there's not alot of texture with things like the robe looking instead like they have big blocks of a few different colour. 16:31, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
As far as graphics go, 2011 is pretty recent though. :/ Besides, I'd argue this looks miles better than the jpeg textures Jiggles are overindulging themselves in nowadays, but that's just my opinion, so eh. 18:37, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
2011 was 6 years ago -- 19:02, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Dated, not very impressive. -- 18:25, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Model is outdated by 6 years, like General Khazard (who is already featured and shown in an attacking pose) 20:51, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - I don't normally judge others' opinions, but I've got to step in here; "6 years old" is not an argument. If you don't like the image for whatever reason, fine, but the subject's release date shouldn't matter at all. Yes, usually something from 2002 will look worse than something from 2012 and you'll have plenty of reasons to dislike it, but release date is not such a reason, ipso facto. As far as RS goes, 2011 is pretty recent too. Moreover, within the last two months an image from 2011 was featured, as well as one from 2012 and one from 2009. Currently, 34 out of 74 (if I counted correctly) featured images have subjects dating to 2011 or earlier. My point is, it doesn't matter when something is released; if Menaphos had been released in 2005 the way it looks now we'd still have featured that image of the palace, and if Ape Atoll had been released last week we'd still think it looks pretty outdated. So please judge the image by how it looks and not when it was taken. PS. @Tony: yeah that's why I was hesitant to nominate Wahi at first but then I figured we have two images of Paterdomus featured as well, and hey - if two Mahjarrat looks flipping awesome in attacking pose, why not both? :D \end{rant} 07:38, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
Some things age better than others: as per the second second sentence in my comment I do not think that this is one of them. 15:33, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, if we're going to have him featured it should be his current look seen here 16:34, July 18, 2017 (UTC).
Apart from that being uglier (IMO), he doesn't look like that in RotM. 16:45, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 00:32, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

### File:Aminishi north district.png

Description: The spooky and seemingly abandoned northern district to Aminishi.
Reason: Its spooky and purdy

• Support - As nominator 20:45, July 31, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - 16:08, August 2, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - 17:19, August 2, 2017 (UTC)
• Strong oppose - Looks like a grey blob when thumb'd. To dark and not very bright, too. 16:25, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
I'd hardly call this image dark when thumb'd, especially compared to the other 4 images it's sitting next to on the Aminishi page. 17:01, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - I've just quickly retaken and uploaded a new version which corrects some scenery being missing on the main island 19:35, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
• Support the retake -- 17:40, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - retake still looks great. 19:40, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - I like the cloudy ambience and it have a good overview of the area. 19:57, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Shows off the island quite well, as well as showing off NXT. --File:General_Khazard_skeletal_chathead.png|20px KelseW aka General Khazard 20:03, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - it's not composed particularly well and the colors are pretty dull. --Iiii I I I 22:27, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Still oppose - The area still looks dull; the mountain in the background is just a grey blob. 06:38, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - I don't really think that this is a good image to feature. It has a nice ambience, sure, but it doesn't look nice on the page without expanding it. The area is just too dark and I see nothing that would catch my eye as a reader and draw me to why the image was actually featured. I think that other images on the Aminishi page, especially File:Aminishi stairs.png, would do a lot better job being featured because they're not too dark and the statues beside the stairs spice it up more than just being a dark and dull image 12:24, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Extended a few days - Dammit people comment earlier. --LiquidTalk 17:38, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Not FIMG worthy. Haidro (talk) 21:24, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 00:43, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

### Kauai parasol

Description: Idk.
Reason: We don't have many equipped images featured: this one shows an attractive and detailed item. The image has been captured well to show the parasol.

• Support - As nominator 08:30, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Great looking pattern on the parasol. 13:07, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Strong oppose First I don't like having itemequips as a FIMG, also the angle dosen't show the integrity of said subject. 20:00, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Personally love the different colours and pattern --File:General_Khazard_skeletal_chathead.png|20px KelseW aka General Khazard 20:06, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Support --Iiii I I I 22:24, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
• Neutral - Very pretty but there's apair of legs sticking out. -.- 06:41, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
Changed to oppose. Giving it some thought, those legs would very definitely be not okay on the main page. 08:35, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - I feel like this is the less interesting/appealing designs out of all the other parasols. Maybe one of those should be used instead? And, I kinda don't like that the only part of the character you can see are the legs. I think the image should be angled slightly to capture a bit more of the character while keeping the parasol in shot 12:15, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Strong oppose - What the heck? How is this a featured image at all? It's literally an equipment image of a circle with legs sticking out and a pretty crap colourful design. The angle is awful. Don't nominate pictures for the sake of not having enough equipment images featured. That defeats the whole purpose of a featured image. Haidro (talk) 21:21, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:47, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

### Lord marshal outfit

Description: The exquisite swagger worn by the highest-ranking ARMS officers.
Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the image's angle makes the player very impressive and intimidating indeed, and of course the clothes looks absolutely fabulous, exuding true authority.

• Support - As nominator. 08:25, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Set doesn't look that great 12:06, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Mild Oppose - Set looks okay, but from an old/outdated minigame -- 12:25, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
How does it matter where it's from..? Oh, and please don't write under {{clear}}, all righty? Thanks. :) 18:01, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
I only said that because the minigame is planned to be removed soon™, so maybe having sets that might be unobtainable in future aren't the best thing to have on featured images. Just my two cents though. And whoops, don't know how I mucked that up. -- 11:46, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
I don't think that's a good reason to oppose. We already have a process for delisting obsolete images. If the minigame gets removed then the image can undergo the mandated obsolete delisting discussion, but as of right now it's still obtainable. Besides, removing Mobilizing Armies has just been floated as an idea by Mod Osborne as far as I can tell. I'm not aware of any intentions to actually remove it.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liquidhelium (talk).
Would not be an obsolete image either, since the set would still be obtainable (presumably, they wouldn't just remove it from the game even if they removed MA (Saradomin forbid)). Even if they would, though, it'd be a historical image, like Xmas 2009 (which is featured). But all technical details aside, if you love the image, you should support, regardless of the source. :) 19:37, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Too red and baggy. Haidro (talk) 01:22, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - Would anyone prefer File:War-chief clothing set equipped.png? It's more vibrant with wiki-esque colours and less baggy. 12:18, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - uggo 17:30, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per star -- 17:55, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:38, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Necromancer robes

Description: Sample description.
Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the robes are incredibly detailed - but not too much so - and look very sinister indeed with the creepy face on the torso, finished by the unsettling ruby in the centre. Also the DII was delisted and we can't have that for the best-looking outfit in the entire game, can we?

• Support - As nominator. 08:31, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - there have been so many better looking outfits in the past years -- 17:56, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
No there haven't, bow to Lord Drakan! >:) (but seriously, you should nominate them, since I sincerely can't think of any) 07:29, August 15, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 05:26, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Black ibis outfit

Description: An ancient set of gear stealthily 'borrowed' from the pharaohs' tombs within Jalsavrah.
Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it would be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, it's just very pretty; I really like the upper sleeves and the pharaoh-esque headdress.

• Support - As nominator. 08:34, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Meh - There's nothing that special about it. It's nice, but I think there's better. Haidro (talk) 01:26, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Lighting and angle are weird, also not that impressive looking compare to the current standard of desert attire with menaphos. -- 17:57, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 05:39, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Primal armour

Description: A most intimidating set of warrior's equipment from the depths of Daemonheim.
Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it would be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the armour simply looks amazing with all the details sticking and twisting out, and the snarling face.

• Support - As nominator. 08:23, August 10, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Lots of detail on this armour, have always liked the look of it -- 11:50, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - I was never a fan of the dungeoneering armor sets. This one in particular just looks weird to me because the proportions seem totally off. The head is disproportionately large and should not be that high above the torso. --LiquidTalk 18:56, August 11, 2017 (UTC)
• Neutral - I can't really see the colours looking good on the main page... The outfit is nicely elaborate though. Haidro (talk) 01:25, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - per liquid -- 17:58, August 14, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 05:40, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

### Menaphite Ancient Outfit

Description: A cosmetic override set resembling the outfits of the citizens of Menaphos.
Reason: cool

• Support - As nominator Iiii I I I 19:44, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - Looks good 00:59, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - +1 --Deltaslug (talk) 01:18, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Maybe it's just me but that mask is freaky. --LiquidTalk 04:36, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - Just a note, this exists. 06:21, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - One of the worst looking outfits in game. 07:46, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Neutral - I'd said I might support this, but although I can't actually pinpoint a concrete reason, it just doesn't seem to appeal to me. :/ 07:32, September 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 19:29, September 27, 2017 (UTC)

### Acheron mammoth

Description: Massive creatures from Acheron, frozen lands north of the Fremennik Provice.
Reason: big

• Support - As nominator Iiii I I I 19:44, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
• Neutral - While I think the image is nice, is it not weird that we advertise pictures like this of such "end-game" mobs that newcomers won't even have access for a fair amount of time if at all? -- 19:51, September 20, 2017 (UTC)
I never really thought of FIMG as "advertising" content per se. From RS:FI: "Featured images are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article." Nothing in there suggests that the article has to be about accessible content. If the image can stand on its own then it is feature-worthy. --LiquidTalk 04:46, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - ^ that being said, I don't think this is one of those images, that mammoth just looks weird. --LiquidTalk 04:46, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Great image, but I don't think the mammoth is very pretty at all. 06:21, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - No. --Deltaslug (talk) 12:12, September 21, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 19:30, September 27, 2017 (UTC)

### Rainbow parasol

Description: The perfect accessory for when there is a rainbow!
Reason: Cool looking item, nice colours, good translucency by MaximusGugu.

• Support - As nominator 11:23, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Either my eyes are dumb but it seems lacking AA, and can see green lines everywhere inside the parasol. - Jr Mime (talk) [VSTF] 01:58, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Absolutely nothing special here. 17:08, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Multiple colours therefore we should feature it...? Haidro (talk) 07:31, November 26, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 01:06, December 7, 2017 (UTC)

### Enakhra apparition

Description: Sample description.
Reason: Cuxrie is a wizard, excellent translucency, spoopy mahjarrat guy.

• Support - As nominator 11:33, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Support - 17:18, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Because the model is bad and out of place confirmed to the original versions of the apparitions. 17:33, November 22, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - Atrocious model, and it's not actually the apparition, just a ghostly version of Enakhra. 17:04, November 23, 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose - It is nice translucency, but it wouldn't look very nice on the main page. Haidro (talk) 07:30, November 26, 2017 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 01:10, December 7, 2017 (UTC)

### Noxious scythe (ice)

Description:
Reason: Good quality image. Everyone likes dyes and ice dye is pretty.

• Support - As nominator 12:26, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose - Not a fan of featuring equipment images, especially when players take up the majority of the space. If the player had different coloured clothes (clashing with the scythe), then I wouldn’t support it at all - but that doesn’t imply that every equipment image we have needs to be with the player having good clothing colours. Also, we never get the angles we want in an equipment image because we want to focus mainly on the weapon, but that often makes the player look way out of place (like it is here). It wouldn’t look good on the main page.
Then I guess this brings up the DII discussion - would I support a DII pic of the scythe? Probably not - I’ve just never seen DIIs as something worthy to be featured (exceptions do apply eg DFS). Prove me wrong though, show me a DII of an ice dyed scythe. Haidro (talk) 23:16, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose - Texture bug. You can see black squareish outlines. Even then, a nox scythe is a bit boting at this point in time. Coelacanth0794 Talk 02:18, March 17, 2018 (UTC)
• Support - Any image of dyed weaponry is always a good addition seeing as its not like there's one appearing everyday. 00:33, March 18, 2018 (UTC)
• Strong oppose - Per haidro. -- 22:37, March 23, 2018 (UTC)
• Closed - image will not be featured. 13:39, March 24, 2018 (UTC)