RuneScape:Article of the Month/archive33
From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Contents |
Candidates
Members
I have decided to nominate it again for Article of the Month since i think it is such a high quality article. My reason is simple that i think it is a very well written article that is well spaced out so it is not a big threatening mass of text. The article is also very practical, being just as useful to members as it is to non-members with sections like "Preparing for an Ending Membership". Evil Yanks talk 06:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support: 13
- Oppose: 0
- Neutral: 0
Support: As Nominator. Evil Yanks talk 06:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Support: I think this article is worthy of the honor. People need to know what membership gives and the disadvantages to ending membership. otherwise, they may not make the best choice on whether to get it or not.-- Peckham33 Talk
19:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Support: Of course one of the most important things in runescape is a member so obviously this page should be featured to let everyone learn about members. Zezzima 04:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Support: My vote (again) goes to this article. It is kept up-to-date, so a useful page for beginners.--
Hapi007 Talk! Sign! . 15:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - free players don't know what they're missing. GoldFalcon 08:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment Nice one :D Zezzima 21:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - Very well-written. Should I ever become a member, I'll use this guide! Oli4burggraa Talk
15:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per last month. ço¬Ø
21:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - Well written, exhaustive information, images well placed and no huge trivia or image gallery at the end. A good choice.--Diberville 21:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - Very well written, and i especially like the preparing for ending membership part, very helpful when i had to cancel my mems.Comment - I feel like I'm the only one who is leaning to disagree and oppose it. The article appears to be a series of lists, rather than being well written in prose. -Byte_Master
17:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- While there are lists on the page, there is still quite a bit of hard writing. This article perfectly fits the requirements to be article of the month. "The article is well written and informative." "The article's pictures look nice and are not scarce." "Overall, the article looks nice and is easy to read." Article of the month is not about the largest articles, it is meant to be about the highest quality articles and deserve praise.
Evil Yanks talk 05:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's the point I'm trying to make. 80% of the content is just lists, which take a huge chunk away from the article's quality. -Byte_Master
07:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's the point I'm trying to make. 80% of the content is just lists, which take a huge chunk away from the article's quality. -Byte_Master
Support - Even though Byte Master has a good point. I think the full list of members' quests isn't needed. It would just need to be updated. Otherwise the article is very informative, and tells the advantanges of membership. That's the article's purpose, so, of course I'm supporting. As an added extra, all images are good quality, and in HD. And Jagex gets a ton of free advertising.
XfinXTalkReply 21:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - Well Written. Japol1
Talk | Sign Here 07:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Support: - I Was Impressed While Reading This!,It Should Be Featured All The Time!, Bytemaster Is Right Though,
Celtic-Creations • Talk to me
God Wars Dungeon
Not only is this a game for avid players, but it is also a well written and detail article. Many players revitalize their gaming experience by showing their strength and perseverance by tackling tough bosses. Whether its for making money, or for pure fun, this is a game and an article everyone needs to know about.
Hess36talk
00:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support: 2
- Neutral: 0
- Oppose: 3
Support As nominator
Hess36talk
00:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose The article contains many grammatical errors and is not very detailed --Template:Signatures/ma44040 01:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose SOMEONE hasn't realized that this article was already featured before...Zezzima 04:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment It hasn't been featured before, this is the location article, the history of the God Wars was the article featured last time. Khalron 14:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment Fine, I messed this up with god wars and godsword, both of which have been featured. But the GWD is a high-leveled area that not many people would make use of (not even I ever went near that place) so i think Member or GE would be better candidates for featured article.
Oppose - The article has some typos, and is far too large. In addition to the dungeon itself, it contains a lot of information belonging to other pages only. (Like the Dying knight, who has his own section.) A lot of information is also pretty trivial. In addition, there's a lot of SD images.
P.S. I think Zezzima's oppose should be deleted, as it has no explanation. Can't remember a policy about it though.
XfinXTalkReply 20:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Support - The GWD is not only the largest and most dangerous dungeon in all of Runescape, but it a great place to make money. Also, many are mis/uninformed of it. —24.125.83.140 (talk • contribs) forgot to sign this comment on 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC).
- comment - should this above one be disregarded as it is from a unofficial source?--
Peckham33 Talk
05:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Grand Exchange
Current Votes:
- Support: 4
- Neutral: 0
- Oppose: 3
This time, I think the page is very informative and useful for players of all levels and backgrounds. The Grand Exchange is the center of all trading and just about everybody in RuneScape uses it to buy, sell, or stand around and trade face to face. Plus, it is what affects the prices of every single tradeable item. This is a major part of RuneScape that should be featured. Whether you're a merchant, skiller, or fighter, you need the Grand Exchange in your life. Zezzima 04:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - As nominator. Zezzima 04:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - As soon as you go on the page, it says that some of the information may be out of date. The point for an article of the month is to show off our top articles, not something that may need improvement.
Hess36talk
05:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment - You just opposed mine so you could support your own article. Very immature. If you think it's outta date, would you kindly tell me what update changed it? And a recent update also happened to summoning so I opposed yours.
comment - it says that because the grand exchange changes daily. that merely says it is mostly but not always 100% true. It is still legit.
- Comment - I removed the outdated sign: there hasn't been an update for the grand exchange for ages and so you shouldn't oppose it. don't just assume it's outdated. Zezzima 23:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- I opposed yours before I nominated mine, i thought that since nothing i supported was up I would make my own
Hess36talk
00:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - I would agree with zezzima. the grand exchange would update everyday so it is really hard to keep updated. I support. —OLEELVL100 (talk • contribs) forgot to sign this comment on 03:55, 5 May 2009.
- Comment - You got me confused... You support, although you agree with an opposer.
XfinXTalkReply 21:14, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose If page may be out of date it should not be nominated. Runeueins 12:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - I removed the outdated sign: there hasn't been an update for the grand exchange for ages and so you shouldn't oppose it. don't just assume it's outdated. Zezzima 23:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - The Grand Exchance article is one of the more in depth ones I have seen on the wiki. Full of information and helpful pictures, some charts and graphs; it's a great tool for people learning about the Grand Exchange, or to get a better taste of it. --
Link199290
21:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Not that it's worth anything, but it's the most helpful page out of the nominations. Asparagoose 20:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Aviansie/Strategies
Current Votes:
- Support: 0
- Oppose: 1
- Neutral: 0
Created this article on behalf of Mage of Zaros...
Tollerach talk
20:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - The article doesn't look too professional. While it may be informative, it still lacks these two criterias:
- The article is well written.
- Nah. The equipment/inventory seems to be (loosely) based on writer's preferences. The equipment/inventory may be hard to get without images. Only the most common strategies are listed, and the article is mostly made up of inventory/equipment lists. Not something I would like to read.
- The article follows the style guide.
- A handful of typos, only two pictures (one JPEG) and neither shows inventory. I found the Tips hard to read; grammar and weird explanations in some cases. Example:
- "Archer Helmet more effective than Robin Hood Hat or coifs as its cheaper but for those who haven't complete Fremennik Trials Blessed Coif is recommended." - Understood, but grammar fiends are terrified.
- "Ring of wealth will NOT change,but will make it less common,so a ring of life is a better choice" - WTF?
- By the way, don't you support your own nomination?
XfinXTalkReply 22:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
