RuneScape:Article of the Month/archive27

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape

Godsword

Current Votes:

• Support: 7
• Oppose: 3
• Neutral: 0

To be honest, I do really like this article, it has been one of my favourites for some time. I do agree with voters on the article's past nominations, it is well written, researched, referenced and represented, which are the makings of a possible article of the month. Thanks, CFLM ^{Talk # Sign} 14:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support - As nominator CFLM ^{Talk # Sign} 14:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support I'm dissapointed that Armour got featured instead of the Godsword. Once again, I think this really deserves to be featured. --Severe Flame 00:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support Again, as I said last month - deserves to be featured.  Gaz Lloyd ^Calcs!_Awesome 19:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support Per Severe Flame and the fact that a godsword is a wonderful piece of equipment that can be used after armor (if you have armour, you need something to attack with) --Craiga2124 02:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose The article does little more than explain what a godsword is and its historical context.Contrast this to the armour page, the latter has a host of information, along with providing various armour permutation for the needy adventurer, but all this article does is state what a godsword is and what its abilities are. It might perhaps be a nominee if it gave the uses, pros and cons of each godsword, along with where their usage can be made maximum, etc. So it might be more expeditious to merge the AGS,ZGS,SGS,BGS with the godsword page before nominating itFireyfox^TALK 08:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Adding a pros and cons section would go against neutral point of view, and stating what an item's abilities are is the whole point of documenting it on our Wiki. CFLM ^{Talk # Sign} 11:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support per what I said last month bufar_(talk) 21:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support Great item if you have the required levels and/or money to obtain one. Smart28^Talk 15:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose -Article is not very informative, layout is sloppy and needs a lot of work, no reason to nominate as i see it.—Aburnett001 (talk • contribs) forgot to sign this comment on 00:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC).

• Support This article states the straight info, with no biased material. It says the info that player want to know. It may not have guides to get it, but that is what other help sites sre for. Bunnies1230_Talk^Edits 18:21, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

• Major Oppose - Not only is this article somewhat cluttered. It would also be the 2nd item article too be featured consecutivley. We instead should be trying too feature an article which is related to a category which has not yet been represented on the main page such as a riot, non-player character etc... the objective of featured article after all is too represent the "best" articles on the wiki from all categories. --Whiplash 03:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Skillcape

Current Votes:

• Support: 1
• Oppose: 3
• Neutral: 0

Lots of people have nominating places. I think skillcape should have been on the article of the months because it has trim skillcape on it and it can do skillcape emote for any skills. Skillcape is the hard to get unless if you are rich. The skillcape cost 99k if you lost it u can buy it again. Japol1 Talk | Sign Here 22:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

• Support - As nominator Japol1 Talk | Sign Here 22:39, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

*Support - I love the skillcape also Cp josh Talk | Sign Here' 07:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

User does not have 50 edits needed to cast vote--Degenret01 03:48, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Cp Josh is a suspected sock puppet of Japol1. This would not be the first sock puppet Japol1 has made.--Degenret01 07:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I am not Japol1. I am Japol1 brother trust me. Cp josh Talk | Sign Here' 07:55, 7 september 2008 (UTC)

Remember, you should nominate an article for its content, not for what it is about. Plus, learn to spell... Ilyas Talk Contribs 00:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose - No good reason for this to be featured has been given.
  Azaz129 ^{Talk Edits Contribs}
  00:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose As stated above, the nominator did not state ANY reason whatsoever as to why the article was RfA-calibur, instead stating a list of the subject of the article, and describing skill capes in general. This shows nothing as to why it's a good article. Stinkowing _{(WHAT'S IN IT?)}

• Oppose -Per azaz129, also I see nothing special about the article that would lead me to think it is worthy of being featured. Aburnett001 ^{{Talk} {#}} 00:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)