Gaming
 

RuneScape:Article of the Month/archive23

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape

Contents

Candidates

Macro (Bots)

I am nominating Macro again, after it became second place two months ago. It is a great article, explaining what macros are, how to find them, the different kinds, has plenty of links and images, and is overall a very well-written article.  C Teng talk 20:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Support: 5
Neutral: 0
Oppose: 0

  • Support as nominator.  C Teng talk 20:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom. --Drummer (speak) 14:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nomination. Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)talk 11:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - nice article. well structured and informative. Miw 14:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - Good article, well made. Liwolf1 23:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Paterdomus

Support: 9
Neutral: 0
Oppose: 0

I nominate this article, as it is well-written with much infomation about the history of RuneScape. It explains the temples story well, and also gives a good description of its surroundings and how they relate to the temple. Artwich 08:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Support as nominator, for reasons stated above. Artwich 08:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Several people, including myself, recently had a hand in improving the article, and I think it's shaped up very nicely. I'd love people to become more exposed to more history-heavy articles, and featuring it on the front page, I feel, could spark more reader interest in the subject. Morian Smith 00:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support I also did some edits to this article (images), it's a very interresting article. A article made for the home page ;) Tokkul Buzz (Talk • # • √ • P ) 11:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support for reasons above. Also, most people consider Paterdomus a "speed bump" to the Ecto-funtus, and I'd like if that changed. It is a rather interesting place. bufar(talk) 03:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support The article opened my eyes a bit, I was one of those who took the place for granted.
  • Support The whole article is generally mistake - free and written with effort and care. Articles like these should be featured as an example of good editing. »»»Pstre1824««« 22:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support It's well written and has some good info that not many people know.Image:piety.PNGAquilaeImage:piety.PNG 03:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support However, it doesn't specify, how could Misthalin army and warriors hold back vyrewatches before Ivandis flail was invented.
Comment - It's never specified how the Misthalin army fought them. I can only assume the vyrewatch didn't fight, but we probably will never know. Morian Smith 14:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Very good information on what is a big part in RuneScape history. It is also just an interesting place. File:Piety.gif Smart28Talk File:Hitpoints-cape-inv.png 19:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Player-owned house

Looks very nice, and helps users out with Construction. Overall, very well-put-together, too. Enough said. Stinkowing (WHAT'S IN IT?)

Support: 1
Neutral: 0
Oppose: 0

Support as nominator Stinkowing (WHAT'S IN IT?)

TokTz-Ket-Dill

About the recent quest. A fantastic guide, well written and and with some great pictures.

Support: 1
Neutral: 0
Oppose: 3

  • Support: per nominator - Evil aer 22:59, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
You have 39 edits as of this moment. Your vote does not count.--24.195.240.91 23:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Ah, ok... I'll reduce the counter. I thought I was closer than that. Evil aer 23:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
A good decision. I'm just wondering who you REALLY are lol :).--24.195.240.91 23:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Evil Aer, your vote does count, regardless of your edit level. These are no rules that state you can not and moreover, a discussion in the Yew Grove about this very topic had the unanimous decision that indeed people who state you can not participate in this of VfD or RfAs because of edits are in error with the one exception of voting for User of the Month.--Diberville 15:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Diberville please read RuneScape:Requested_featured_articles under the voting section. It would appear that that featured articles and UOTM are pretty much the 2 places where edits are still needed to vote. Because, most likely, these 2 things ARE done on a voting basis. Not concensus.--24.195.240.91 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
That was Sacre Fi who unilaterally copied and pasted the UotM instructions in to AotM without discussion. If you check here, you'll see that the no one is against removing the edit minimum is required in the UotM since no oppose vote can be placed. As soon as that particular discussion gets officially closed, the rules will be modified to state that anyone can participate there will be no limits on who may participate with the sole exception of UotM. Of course if you really feel that we should follow this rule until that time, I'm willing to conceed the point. If you feel that the 50 edit minimum should also be in place for the AotM, I strongly urge you to voice your opinion in the Yew Grove discussion.--Diberville 16:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Not ready yet; still need maps for the 3 rooms for placement of pillars and planks which other fansites have. Chrislee33 05:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
  • It is a useful guide, but still needs a lot of work for it to reach article of the month status. The text still does not read nicely. The flow could be more optimized e.g. describe steps in another sequence. Oppose. Miw 14:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose since it isn't what I would consider featured article status, as others have noted, there still is work to be done and incidentally, we've just had a recent quest as an AotM.--Diberville 15:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/RuneScape:Article_of_the_Month/archive23"