 |
This page or section is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. This thread was archived on 31 January 2009 by AndorinKato. |
What is the process to move a proposed policy into actual policy? My guess, "Consensus", as such I'm asking for a quick vote on the Image and Media Policy.
- Support - naturally since I am the one wanting to finalise this.
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 04:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - Looks great, though I'm not sure about one item, that is videos not to be used in articles. We have many, many videos in articles, and I'm sure we don't want to be deleting them all. I support apart from that. Hurston 17:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- The term 'video' seems unclear as of your posting, so along with other proposed policies these should be reviewed imo.
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 01:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support - Everything seems to be in order.-- 18:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - Do project-related images include images used in the Yew Grove or in the Talk namespace (besides in signatures)? For example, if someone uploaded an image to show an example for a talk page, but the image isn't used anywhere else. User:C Teng/sig 12:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I do not see any problematic areas in the policy and the policy makes sense. - TehKittyCat (talk) 03:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed policies
There are other [[:Category:Proposed policies|Proposed policies]] that need to be revisited, and some of them are really, really old.
On another note, I'd like to "nominate" the Quest style guide written by Endasil to be included in our official Style guide. It needs some modifications, but I think it is well written and should be made "official". az talk 03:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- If Endasil's quest style guide is ready, why not go ahead and move it over to RS:QSG?
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 01:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Done. I've expanded the RuneScape:Quest style guide to include the layout for a quest page. Feel free to tinker with it. az talk 17:31, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
RFAP needs to be deleted. It's almost completely wrong (anyone can participate in RfAs and there are no prerequisites that need to be fulfilled to be nominated), the page is still under construction and its creator has left the wiki. Speedy D it.--Diberville 17:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
RS:DSA
This particular proposed policy seems to be nothing more than a specific instance of the ownership and bias section of the style guide. As such I believe it would be best to redirect RS:DSA to that section of the style guide, and possibly incorporate it into the style guide as opposed to having it as it's own policy.
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 01:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- RS:DSA gives much more information than the small bullet point in the Ownership and bias section in the Style Guide. If we decide to delete the page, I think that we should give it its own subsection in the Style Guide. User:C Teng/sig 13:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Agree ~
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 17:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
17:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- On second thought I'm thinking maybe the subsection and the DSA policy should cross reference each other. Regardless I am not advocating the removal of any content of DSA, regardless of whether it stays in place or migrates.
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 07:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
RS:S
I'd really like to see this one brought to life (along with RS:IMP)
- REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 17:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support - I agree, that's why I undeleted it.-- 17:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)