 |
This page or section is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. This thread was archived on 20 June 2009 by Soldier 1033. |
I request that the UnFunOrb Wiki be added to the sidebar under related communities. It's not like UnRuneScape, it's clean humor. There is a policy to keep it clean. It's rather dead, and a little traffic form here would really help. --— Enigma 15:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Slight support - The wiki seems new. Although it seems pretty nice. Their title about what UFO meant (UnFunOrb wiki >.< ) was quite amusing. I also enjoyed Arcanists article on that page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Powers38 (talk).
Comment - Does anyone know the reason why we don't affiliate with the FunOrb Wiki? It might be relevant to this discussion. C.ChiamTalk 15:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- No one from the FunOrb wiki has requested that we do? --— Enigma 15:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, I think none of us at the FunOrb Wiki have thought of it. I might raise the idea over there. Quartic ~ insanity is a virtue | Talk 23:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Pending, leaning towards Support - I haven't had that much of a looksee at UFOW yet, but the bit I have seen is clean and appropiate. I'll have to do a more throughout look later, and see what I think after that. --
Pikaandpi Berserker Fury!
16:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Regrettable change of heart, see below
Oppose - It doesn't have anything to do with Runescape. 
Doucher4000******r4000
18:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Slight Oppose - While RuneScape and FunOrb are both owned by Jagex, I really don't think that they have too much in common to actually make sense out of an affiliation with them. 
Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 18:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Slight Oppose - Sorry to have a change of heart like this, but Spence is right. I think the main problem is that we're not even affilated with the main FOW, which makes this seem a little bit... awkward (no offense intended). Don't get me wrong, it's a great little Wiki (I may see about helping "vertically stretch" it, which, for the record, I love how you put that =D), but unless we've affilated with the main FOW, it seems a little... strange. So sorry. -- Pikaandpi Berserker Fury! 18:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Slight oppose - Per Pika. 
@Gaz#7521 19:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - These spin off wikis are getting old. 
TEbuddy 20:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Per Pika and such. Affiliations with the main FunOrb Wiki would be just fine, but affiliations with the UnFunOrb Wiki is stretching it--especially when no relations between us and the main FunOrb Wiki is going on. I'd just say no. 
Chiafriend12
Loon is best buttlord 21:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment - Maybe I'm slightly confused or need sleep, but the OP mentioned adding UnFunOrb to the related communities box on the sidebar as a form of affiliation, yet we aren't affiliated with UnRuneScape and FunOrb wikias per this discussion but those are listed in that box? Do we have specific control over what is actually listed in that box? --Quarenon T / C 23:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Do we really need sister clans? I don't feel anything in it. Per Pika. 
Mo 55 55 Talk|Sign 06:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - How could RS and UnFO possibly be related communities.. Andrew talk 18:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Just cos both made by Jagex doesn't mean they are the same. FIFA 09 and Need For Speed are both EA but not affiliated.Joe Click Here for Awesomeness14:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- EA is a much larger company with hundereds of games, their seperate wikis of course don't have enough room to relate to them all. Jagex, however, only has 2 games (if you count all the FunOrb games as one game) --— Enigma 15:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- FunOrb is nothing like RuneScape and we aren't even affiliated with it. Using that same logic, why should we affiliate ourselves with a wiki that makes fun of FunOrb, especially when we just broke our ties with a wiki that makes fun of RuneScape. Andrew talk 16:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- In all fairness, we didn't break ties with them because they made fun of RuneScape but because of their content. It's a bit irrelevant to mention the "making fun of" part. C.ChiamTalk 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh its Unfunorb! Ohhhh. In that case I even more oppose, as Unencyclopedia's are a magnet for evil people.Joe Click Here for Awesomeness18:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- In all fairness, we didn't break ties with them because they made fun of RuneScape but because of their content. It's a bit irrelevant to mention the "making fun of" part. C.ChiamTalk 16:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- FunOrb is nothing like RuneScape and we aren't even affiliated with it. Using that same logic, why should we affiliate ourselves with a wiki that makes fun of FunOrb, especially when we just broke our ties with a wiki that makes fun of RuneScape. Andrew talk 16:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Not really related communities in my opinion. Also, no partnership came up with the FunOrb Wiki so I feel that at if we don't even have an affiliation with the main wiki, we shouldn't have it with a spin off type. ~MuzTalk 19:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - Per Spencemac.--
05:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - I don't think it's in the spirit of wiki to document misinformation as real information. Zig 06:39, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - We're not even affiliated with the UnRS wiki, so why would we be affiliated with the UnFO wiki? 
Oil4 Talk 08:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- We're not affilited with UnRS because its full of dirty humor. UnFO is clean. --— Enigma 16:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - I really don't think un wikis should be under affiliated sites, they are not anything to do with us. --Serenity1137 14:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Request for closure - This has less chance of getting through than a Yorkie terrier has walking through a stone wall. --— Enigma 16:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Closed - The consensus is not to affiliate with the UnFunorb Wiki. Andrew talk 16:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)